Displaying publications 1 - 20 of 49 in total

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ajjawi R, Crampton PES, Ginsburg S, Mubuuke GA, Hauer KE, Illing J, et al.
    Med Educ, 2022 Mar;56(3):252-256.
    PMID: 35040180 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14724
  2. Eachempati P, Ramnarayan K
    Med Educ, 2020 08;54(8):678-680.
    PMID: 32473029 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14257
  3. Brouwer E, Frambach J, Somodi K, Nadarajah VD, Driessen E
    Med Educ, 2020 05;54(5):427-435.
    PMID: 31912525 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14054
    CONTEXT: Internationalisation in medical education raises ethical concerns over, for instance, its for-profit orientation, the potential erosion of cultural diversity and the possibility that standardised education may not meet the needs of patients everywhere. These concerns fit into a broader debate on social responsibility in higher education. This study aims to explore how academic staff in international medical education experience and act upon the ethical concerns that pertain to their programmes. By adding their perspectives to the debate, this study helps us understand how theory-based ethical concerns are reflected in practice.

    METHODS: We conducted a multicentre instrumental case study across three international medical programmes, all of which were characterised by an international student intake, an internationalised curriculum and international partnerships, and all of which used English as the medium of instruction. We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled curriculum directors and teaching staff. Participants shared their personal experiences and responded to ethical concerns expressed in the literature. Our multidisciplinary team performed a template analysis of the data based on theoretical frameworks of ethics and social responsibility.

    RESULTS: Participants primarily experienced the internationalisation of their institutions and programmes as having a positive impact on students, the university and the future global society. However, they did face several ethical dilemmas. The first of these involved the possibility that marketisation through international recruitment and the application of substantial tuition fees might widen access to medical education, but might allow weaker students to enter medical schools. The second concern referred to the homogenisation of education methods and content, which offers opportunities to expose students to best practices, but may also pose a risk to education quality. The third issue referred to the experience that although student diversity helped to promote intercultural learning, it also jeopardised student well-being.

    CONCLUSIONS: In the eyes of teaching staff in international medical education, internationalisation can benefit education quality and society, but poses ethical dilemmas through the forces of marketisation, homogenisation and diversification. The findings reflect a tension between the views of scholars and those of practitioners. The critical perspective found in academic debates is largely missing in practice, and theoretical frameworks on ethics possibly overlook the benefits of international education. To facilitate ethical decision making, we propose that scholars and practitioners globally try to learn from each other.

  4. Venkataramani P, Sadanandan T, Savanna RS, Sugathan S
    Med Educ, 2019 05;53(5):499-500.
    PMID: 30891812 DOI: 10.1111/medu.13860
  5. Tackett S, Wright S, Lubin R, Li J, Pan H
    Med Educ, 2017 Mar;51(3):280-289.
    PMID: 27896846 DOI: 10.1111/medu.13120
    OBJECTIVE: To assess whether favourable perceptions of the learning environment (LE) were associated with better quality of life, less burnout and more empathy across three undergraduate medical education programmes in Israel, Malaysia and China.

    METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys were administered at the end of the 2013-2014 academic year at three medical schools: Technion American Medical Students Program (TAMS) in Israel, Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine (PURCSI) in Malaysia and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) in China. LE perceptions were assessed using the Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES). Well-being was assessed using validated items for quality of life and the depersonalisation and emotional exhaustion domains of burnout. The 20-item Jefferson Empathy Scale assessed empathy. Statistical analyses included bivariate regressions and multivariate regressions that adjusted for gender, school, class year and perceived academic rank.

    RESULTS: Overall, 400/622 (64.3%) students responded, with the following rates by site: TAMS 92/121 (76.0%), PURCSI 160/198 (80.1%) and PUMC 148/303 (48.8%). In multivariate models, favourable overall LE perceptions were associated with higher odds of good quality of life (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.8; p < 0.001) and lower odds of emotional exhaustion (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50; p < 0.001) and depersonaliation (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.24-0.37; p = 0.001). 'Community of Peers', one of seven factors in the JHLES, was the only one to be independently associated with better quality of life and less emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation. After adjusting for covariates, there was not a statistically significant association between overall LE and empathy (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.91-2.2; p = 0.12).

    CONCLUSIONS: Students' LE perceptions are closely associated with their well-being, and fostering peer community may hold promise for enhancing quality of life and protecting against burnout. Across these three settings, LE and empathy were not closely related, suggesting that any influence of learning environment on empathy would be modest.
  6. Loo JL, Koh EB, Pang NT, Nor Hadi NM
    Med Educ, 2016 Nov;50(11):1165.
    PMID: 27762032 DOI: 10.1111/medu.13195
  7. Foong CC, Tong WT, Daniel EG, Vadivelu J
    Med Educ, 2013 May;47(5):516-7.
    PMID: 23574067 DOI: 10.1111/medu.12155
    Study site: Universiti Malaya, Phase 2 clinical students.
  8. Loh KY, Nalliah S
    Med Educ, 2010 Nov;44(11):1123.
    PMID: 20963918
  9. Van Rostenberghe H, Yusoff MS, Jie TY, Shamsuddin S, Ibrahim WP
    Med Educ, 2010 May;44(5):504-5.
    PMID: 20518994 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03647.x
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links