METHODS: Poultry meat (breast, wing, thigh, and keel) as well as the contact surfaces of weighing scales and cutting boards were sampled to detect ESBL-EC by using culture and disk combination methods and polymerase chain reaction assays. Besides, questionnaire was used to obtain data and information pertaining to those operational practices that may possibly explain the occurrence of ESBL-EC. The data were analysed using logistic regression analysis at 95 % CI.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ESBL-EC was 48.8 % (95 % CI, 42 - 55 %). Among the risk factors that were explored, type of countertop, sanitation of the stall environment, source of cleaning water, and type of cutting board were found to be significantly associated with the presence of ESBL-EC.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, in order to prevent or reduce the presence of ESBL-EC and other contaminants at the retail-outlet, there is a need to design a process control system based on the current prevailing practices in order to reduce cross contamination, as well as to improve food safety and consumer health.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on consecutive adult cases of ESBL and AmpC bacteremia at the Alfred Hospital from 2014 through April 2018.
RESULTS: Among 110 patients with ESBL (88.2%) and AmpC (14.5%) bacteremia episodes, 96.4% had comorbidities such as hematological malignancy (30%). Approximately 45% were on immunosuppressive drugs, while 69% had recent antibiotic exposure. Over 84% of bacteremias were hospital acquired or healthcare associated. Urinary tract was the main source of infection (40%) with E. coli being the commonest organism (66.4%). The isolates were least resistant to gentamicin (21.8%), which was often appropriately used in empirical therapy. About 34% of patients presented with severe sepsis or shock. The 30-day mortality rate was 20% with no correlation with inappropriate empirical antibiotics (52%). There was no significant mortality difference between carbapenem use in empirical and definitive therapy. Respiratory source [OR 11.77, 95% CI 1.30-106.85; p = 0.03], severe sepsis or shock [OR 5.17, 95% CI 1.37-19.55; p = 0.02] and inappropriate definitive therapy [OR 27.93, 95%CI 3.69-211.35; p = 0.001] were independent predictors for mortality.
CONCLUSION: The choice and appropriateness of empirical therapy were not associated with mortality in ESBL and AmpC bacteremia. Prudent use of carbapenem is reasonable with gentamicin as alternative. Emphasis should be on prompt resuscitation in severe sepsis and early detection of ESBL and AmpC to facilitate appropriate switch to definitive therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective epidemiologic and microbiologic study was conducted of MRKP isolated from the blood and wound of a boy with necrotizing fasciitis after a 7-day course of ceftazidime and amikacin. In the following 2 weeks, phenotypically similar MRKP were isolated from the blood cultures of four other patients and rectal swabs of another three patients and two liquid soap samples located in the same ward.
RESULTS: Antimicrobial profiles demonstrated that all the isolates were resistant to ceftazidime, sensitive to imipenem and ciprofloxacin, and confirmed to be extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. Plasmids of varying molecular weights were present in all isolates. In eight of these isolates, which included four from blood, there were common large molecular weight plasmids ranging from 80 kb to 100 kb. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis using XbaI demonstrated six different DNA profiles, A to F. Profile A was shared by two blood culture isolates and were related by 91%. Profile B was found in one rectal swab isolate and one isolate from liquid soap and were related by 94%. Profile C was shared by one blood isolate and one liquid soap isolate and showed 100% relatedness. Profiles D, E, and F each were demonstrated by one blood isolate and two rectal swab isolates, respectively. These showed only 65% relatedness.
CONCLUSIONS: The MRKP strains in this outbreak were not clonal in origin. The decline of the outbreak after 4 weeks was attributed to the reemphasis of standard infection control procedures and the implementation of a program that addressed sites of environmental contamination.