MATERIALS AND METHODS: 51 cases of DLBCL paraffin-embedded tissue samples were retrieved from a single private hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. EBER-ISH was performed to identify the EBV expression; ten EBV(+)-DLBCL cases subjected to immunohistochemistry for LMP1, pJAK1, pSTAT3 and MYC; FISH assay for c-MYC gene rearrangement.
RESULTS: Among 10 cases of EBV(+)-DLBCL, 90% were non-GCB subtype (p=0.011), 88.9% expressed LMP1. 40% EBV(+)-DLBCL had pJAK1 expression.
CONCLUSION: 66.7% EBV(+)-DLBCL showed the positivity of pSTAT3, which implies the involvement of EBV in constitutive JAK/STAT pathway. 44.5% EBV(+)-DLBCL have co-expression of pSTAT3 and MYC, but all EBV(+)-DLBCL was absence with c-MYC gene rearrangement. The finding of clinical samples might shed lights to the lymphomagenesis of EBV associated with non-GCB subtypes, and the potential therapy for pSTAT3-mediated pathway.
AIMS: To determine the usefulness of immunohistochemical techniques and FISH of the tumour suppressor TP 53 gene to identify microinvasion in marginal tissue sections and to relate the possible correlation between protein expression and genetic aberrations in OSCC cases in Malaysia.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry and FISH of TP 53 genes were applied on 26 OSCC formalin fixed paraffin embed (FFEP) blocks selected from two oral cancer referral centers in Malaysia.
RESULTS: For p53 protein immunohistochemistry, 96% of the 26 OSCC studied showed positive immunostaining at the excision margins. In FISH assay, 48.9±9.7% of the cancerous cells were monoploid for p53 probe signals, 41.0±9.5 % were diploid, and 10.2±7.8 % were polyploid. A correlation between p53 immunostaining and TP53 gene aberrations was noted (p< 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 protein expression and FISH of TP53 gene could be applied as screening tool for microinvasion of OSCC.
METHODS: Pooled urine samples of patients with BTG (n=10), patients with PTC (n=9) and healthy controls (n=10) were subjected to iTRAQ analysis and immunoblotting.
RESULTS: The ITRAQ analysis of the urine samples detected 646 proteins, 18 of which showed significant altered levels (p<0.01; fold-change>1.5) between patients and controls. Whilst four urinary proteins were commonly altered in both BTG and PTC patients, 14 were unique to either BTG or PTC. Amongst these, four proteins were further chosen for validation using immunoblotting, and the enhanced levels of osteopontin in BTG patients and increased levels of a truncated gelsolin fragment in PTC patients, relative to controls, appeared to corroborate the findings of the iTRAQ analysis.
CONCLUSION: The data of the present study is suggestive of the potential application of urinary osteopontin and gelsolin to discriminate patients with BTG from those with PTC non-invasively. However, this needs to be further validated in studies of individual urine samples.