CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man was diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Following this, he underwent all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) based chemotherapy and achieved remission. Four years later, the disease relapsed and he was given idarubicin, mitoxantrone and ATRA followed by maintenance chemotherapy (ATRA, mercaptopurine and methotrexate). He achieved a second remission for the next 11 years. During a follow-up later, his full blood picture showed leucocytosis, anaemia and leucoerythroblastic picture. Bone marrow examination showed hypercellular marrow with trilineage dysplasia, 3% blasts but no abnormal promyelocyte. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) study of the PML/RARA gene was negative. Karyotyping result revealed complex abnormalities and monosomal karyotype (MK). A diagnosis of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with unfavourable karyotypes and MK was made. The disease progressed rapidly and transformed into therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia in less than four months, complicated with severe pneumonia. Despite aggressive treatment with antibiotics and chemotherapy, the patient succumbed to the illness two weeks after the diagnosis.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of t-MN should be suspected in patients with a history of receiving cytotoxic agents. Karyotyping analysis is crucial for risk stratification as MK in addition to complex aberrant karyotypes predicts unfavourable outcome. Further studies are required to address the optimal management for patients with t-MN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all HMs cases diagnosed in our centre over a six-year period. p57 immunohistochemistry stain was performed. Only nuclear immunoreactivity in >50% of cytotrophoblasts and villous stromal cells was regarded as positive for p57. DNA ploidy status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. A total of 250 cells from five chorionic villi were counted and were scored as diploid or triploid if more than 10% of nuclei demonstrated two or three signals, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 51 cases originally diagnosed by histomorphology as complete mole (n = 18), partial mole (n = 24) and non-molar abortus (n = 9) were recruited. The cases were reclassified based on the p57 immunostaining pattern and DNA ploidy status, into 27 complete moles (p57-/diploid), 9 partial moles (p57+/triploid) and 15 non-molar abortus (p57+/diploid). The diagnostic accuracy by histomorphological features alone in each category: complete moles, partial moles and non-molar abortus was 78.4%, 70.6% and 88.2% respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of the utility of combined p57 immunostain and DNA ploidy analysis in arriving at an accurate diagnosis in HMs. An algorithmic approach utilising these ancillary techniques is advocated in routine diagnostic workup for a more refined diagnostic approach to HMs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using next-generation sequencing, the miRNAs profiles of CM (n=3) and PM (n=3) moles, including placenta of non-molar abortus (n=3) as control were determined. The differentially expressed miRNAs between each group were analysed. Subsequently, bioinformatics analysis using miRDB and Targetscan was utilised to predict target genes.
RESULTS: We found 10 differentially expressed miRNAs in CMs and PMs, compared to NMAs, namely miR- 518a-5p, miR-423-3p, miR-503-5p, miR-302a-3p, and miR-1323. The other 5 miRNAs were novel, not listed in the known database. The 3 differentially expressed miRNAs in CMs were predicted to commonly target ZTBT46 and FAM73B mRNAs.
DISCUSSION: miR-518 was consistently observed to be downregulated in CM versus PM, and CM versus NMA. Further bioinformatic analysis to provide insight into the possible role of these miRNAs in the pathogenesis of HMs, progression of disease and as potential diagnostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets for HMs is needed.