METHODS: Medical records of patients who were treated for LM in the Paediatric Surgical Centre Universitas Gadjah Mada from January 2015 to January 2019 were reviewed. Scoring systems were used to assess the outcomes, including reduction of size, problems of aesthetics, functional problems, complications, necessity of further interventions, and interventions' frequencies.
RESULTS: During the four-year study, we included 31 children, consisting of 6, 5, and 20 patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. The total score did not significantly differ between Groups I, II, and III (14.67±2.80 vs. 13.40±2.07 vs. 12.50±1.47, respectively; p=0.056). Group II scored better in aesthetic problems than other groups (p=0.001), Group III scored higher in necessity of further interventions compared to the other groups (p=0.026), and Group I was higher in interventions' frequencies than the other groups (p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in reduction of size, functional problems, and complications among groups (p=0.554, 0.151, and 0.076, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant different effect of the three modalities treatment for LM, although one group might have more beneficial effects compared with the other groups due to different scoring system parameters. Further multicentre and prospective cohort studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to establish the existence and extent of our findings.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of BA patients who underwent Kasai procedure at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia from August 2012 to December 2018. The cut-off values of TB7/TB0, GGT7/GGT0, and ALT7/ALT0 for prediction of patients' survival were determined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Log-rank tests were utilised to test the association between cut-off values and overall survival.
RESULTS: In all 46 BA patients (23 males and 23 females) after Kasai procedure were included, consisting of one type 1, 17 type 2A, seven type 2B, and 21 type 3. The cut-off values of TB7/TB0, ALT7/ALT0 and GGT7/GGT0 for overall survival was 0.455 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 22.7%, area under curve (AUC) 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 0.42, 0.75), 0.481 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 18.2%, AUC 0.49; 95%CI: 0.31, 0.65), and and 0.31 (sensitivity 79.2%, specificity 9.1%, AUC 0.34; 95%CI: 0.18, 0.50), respectively. However, these cut-off values were not significantly associated with overall survival, with p-values of 0.18, 0.49, and 0.56, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The TB7/TB0, ALT7/ALT0, and GGT7/GGT0 might not predict the overall survival of BA patients after Kasai procedure. Further multicentre studies with a larger sample size is needed to clarify our findings.
METHODS: Medical records of all HSCR patients who underwent pull-through at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia between January 2010 and August 2016 were reviewed for their growth outcomes before and after the surgery.
RESULTS: We included 64 HSCR patients, 45 males and 19 females, of which 14, 17, and 33 patients underwent Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT respectively. There were no nutritional status differences in HSCR patients after Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT surgery (p=0.07, 0.17, and 0.79, respectively). Z-score average of weight-for-age did not differ between three surgical methods (p=0.77 and 0.15 for preoperative and postoperative, respectively). In addition, the improvement of nutritional status was achieved in 21.2% HSCR patients after TEPT, 14.3% post Duhamel and 5.9% following Soave procedure, but these differences did not reach a significant level (p=0.34).
DISCUSSION: Our study shows no difference in effect on the growth outcomes in HSCR patients following Duhamel, Soave and TEPT procedure. Further study with a larger sample size is important to give valuable long-term growth outcomes for HSCR patients after pull-through.
METHODS: This observational research used a spatiotemporal approach. We obtained CRS and rubella surveillance data from Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Provincial, and District Health Offices in Yogyakarta, Indonesia during January-April 2019. The home addresses of rubella and CRS cases were geocoded using the Global Positioning System. Average of the nearest neighbour and space-time permutation analyses were conducted to discover the spatiotemporal patterns and clusters of rubella and CRS cases.
RESULTS: The peak of rubella cases occurred in 2017 (IR: 22.3 per 100,000 population). Twelve confirmed cases of CRS were found in the 2016-2018 period (IR: 0.05 per 1,000 live births). The occurrence of CRS in Yogyakarta was detected 6-8 months after the increase and peak of rubella cases. The spatiotemporal analysis showed that rubella cases were mostly clustered, while CRS cases were distributed in a dispersed pattern. Rubella cases were found within a buffer zone of 2.5 km from any CRS case.
CONCLUSIONS: Rubella cases were spatiotemporally associated with the occurrence of CRS in Yogyakarta. We recommend strengthening the surveillance system of CRS and rubella cases in order to contain any further spreading of the disease.