Genome mining revealed a 1011 nucleotide-long fragment encoding a type I L-asparaginase (J15 asparaginase) from the halo-tolerant Photobacterium sp. strain J15. The gene was overexpressed in pET-32b (+) vector in E. coli strain Rosetta-gami B (DE3) pLysS and purified using two-step chromatographic methods: Ni(2+)-Sepharose affinity chromatography and Q-Sepharose anion exchange chromatography. The final specific activity and yield of the enzyme achieved from these steps were 20 U/mg and 49.2%, respectively. The functional dimeric form of J15-asparaginase was characterised with a molecular weight of ~70 kDa. The optimum temperature and pH were 25°C and pH 7.0, respectively. This protein was stable in the presence of 1 mM Ni(2+) and Mg(2+), but it was inhibited by Mn(2+), Fe(3+) and Zn(2+) at the same concentration. J15 asparaginase actively hydrolysed its native substrate, l-asparagine, but had low activity towards l-glutamine. The melting temperature of J15 asparaginase was ~51°C, which was determined using denatured protein analysis of CD spectra. The Km, Kcat, Kcat/Km of J15 asparaginase were 0.76 mM, 3.2 s(-1), and 4.21 s(-1) mM(-1), respectively. Conformational changes of the J15 asparaginase 3D structure at different temperatures (25°C, 45°C, and 65°C) were analysed using Molecular Dynamic simulations. From the analysis, residues Tyr₂₄ , His₂₂, Gly₂₃, Val₂₅ and Pro₂₆ may be directly involved in the 'open' and 'closed' lid-loop conformation, facilitating the conversion of substrates during enzymatic reactions. The properties of J15 asparaginase, which can work at physiological pH and has low glutaminase activity, suggest that this could be a good candidate for reducing toxic effects during cancer treatment.
Enzymes are often required to function in a particular reaction condition by the industrial procedure. In order to identify critical residues affecting the optimum pH of Staphylococcal lipases, chimeric lipases from homologous lipases were generated via a DNA shuffling strategy. Chimeric 1 included mutations of G166S, K212E, T243A, H271Y. Chimeric 2 consisted of substitutions of K212E, T243A, H271Y. Chimeric 3 contained substitutions of K212E, R359L. From the screening results, the pH profiles for chimeric 1 and 2 lipases were shifted from pH 7 to 6. While the pH of chimeric 3 was shifted to 8. It seems the mutation of K212E in chimeric 1 and 2 decreased the pH to 6 by changing the electrostatic potential surface. Furthermore, chimeric 3 showed 10 ˚C improvement in the optimum temperature due to the rigidification of the catalytic loop through the hydrophobic interaction network. Moreover, the substrate specificity of chimeric 1 and 2 was increased towards the longer carbon length chains due to the mutation of T243A adjacent to the lid region through increasing the flexibility of the lid. Current study illustrated that directed evolution successfully modified lipase properties including optimum pH, temperature and substrate specificity through mutations, especially near catalytic and lid regions.