AIMS: We conducted a voluntary, anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey of a group of 164 final year medical students and 60 final year dental students to unravel their attitudes towards performing bystander CPR.

METHODS: Using a 4-point Likert scale of "definitely yes," "probably yes," "probably no," and "definitely no," the students were asked to rate their willingness to perform bystander CPR under three categories: chest compressions with mouth-to-mouth ventilation (CC + MMV), chest compressions with mask-to-mouth ventilation (CC + PMV), and chest compressions only (CC). Under each category, the students were given ten hypothetical victim scenarios. Categorical data analysis was done using the McNemar test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test where appropriate. For selected analysis, "definitely yes" and "probably yes" were recoded as a "positive response."

RESULTS: Generally, we found that only 51.4% of the medical and 45.5% of the dental students are willing to perform bystander CPR. When analyzed under different hypothetical scenarios, we found that, except for the scenario where the victim is their own family member, all other scenarios showed a dismally low rate of positive responses in the category of CC + MMV, but their willingness was significantly improved under the CC + PMV and CC categories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel consists of ten experts from ED that was randomly chosen from list of specialists obtained from the National Specialist Registry for Emergency Medicine. A set of questionnaires that contains item constructs related to KPI based on structure, outcome and process was developed from initial literature search from Pubmed Central, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database and Public Library of Sciences. The construct then used for FDM session in second phase of the study. In FDM phase, the experts will rank each of the items created from nominal group technique (NGT) session by using Likert Scale ranged from 1 to 5 ("1" totally disagree and "5" extremely agree). FDM prerequisite must include threshold value (d) ≤0.2, expert consensus of >75% and average fuzzy numbers ("A" value) of >0.5.

RESULTS: The initial item construct has produced 22 items proposed for the service KPI. Post FDM analysis for service KPI, 16 out of the 22 (72%) satisfied first prerequisite "d" value ≤0.2. For the second prerequisite, ten items (45%) from service KPI domain had expert consensus of more than 75%. For the third prerequisite, 16 out of the 22 (73%) fit the criteria of average fuzzy number ("A" value) of more than 0.5. In final model of FDM, 13 items (59%) were discarded and the remaining (n=9 items) that fulfilled all three prerequisites were retained for the final draft for content validation process.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to November 2021 by recruiting 333 employers at healthcare facilities in Kelantan, Malaysia. The original draft of the Malay version of the questionnaire comprised 62 items constructed under two domains (perception and practice). A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate construct validity and internal consistency using R software.

RESULTS: The final model for the perception and practice domain of the questionnaire consisted of 13 factors and 56 items. The factor loadings for all items were above 0.6. The fit indices used for confirmatory factor analysis in the final model were as follows: χ2 = 2092.6 (P < 0.001), standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR) = 0.053, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.042, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.928 and Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.920. The construct reliability for all factors was reliable, with Raykov's rho coefficients above 0.70.