Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Naing C, Aung K, Mak JW
    J Evid Based Med, 2012 Nov;5(4):232-7.
    PMID: 23557504 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12002
    In translating clinical research into practice, the summarization of data from randomized trials in terms of measures of effect to be readily appreciated by the point-of-care clinicians is important. In this context, the body of literature highlighted the 'number needed to treat' as a useful measure. The objectives of our study were to assess how meta-analyses described number needed to treat and corresponding 95% CI, and to explore issues related to reporting number needed to treat in the selected meta-analyses.
  2. Naing C, Hasan SS, Aung K
    J Evid Based Med, 2011 Nov;4(4):255-8.
    PMID: 23672756 DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01156.x
    (i) To explore any discrepancies in intervention effects between a set of Cochrane reviews that includes trials with liberal criteria and a set with restrictive criteria in which trials with liberal design have been removed from the review, and (ii) to suggest ways to improve the quality of evidence.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links