Displaying all 6 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Othman NH, Othman MS, Ismail AN, Mohammad NZ, Ismail Z
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996 May;36(2):216-8.
    PMID: 8798320
    A 30-year old female who initially had typical endometriosis treated according to a standard regimen later developed numerous highly vascular endometrial polyps on the vagina, cervix, ureter, serosal surfaces of the uterus, pouch of Douglas (POD) and other areas of pelvic peritoneum as well as the endometrium 8 months after withdrawal of treatment with Zoladex gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist used for treatment of this disease. We postulate that these polyps developed as a rebound phenomenon upon withdrawal of Zoladex. We believe this is the first report of this complication following use of GnRH analogue.
    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects*
  2. Abubakar MB, Wei K, Gan SH
    Pharmacogenet Genomics, 2014 Dec;24(12):575-81.
    PMID: 25203739 DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000092
    Breast cancer is a common cause of cancer mortality among women. Several genetic factors have been implicated in its development. Current treatment guidelines for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer recommend that anastrozole [or any of the other two aromatase inhibitors (letrozole and exemestane)] is used as an alternative to tamoxifen or following several years of tamoxifen treatment. Nevertheless, this approach is still associated with many challenges, ranging from the recurrence of breast cancer to considerable interindividual variability in the tolerability of anastrozole, which may cause adverse effects, such as musculoskeletal symptoms, and lead to the withdrawal of many patients from treatment. Variabilities in the genes encoding the drug target (aromatase) or its metabolizing enzymes (CYP3A and UGT1A) contribute toward the interindividual variability in anastrozole's pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics. This paper reviews the role of genetic polymorphisms of CYP19A1, CYP3A4, and UGT1A4 in the responses of female hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients to anastrozole. Many reviews in the literature have suggested that the study of functional polymorphisms and investigation of relevant genetic markers may provide valuable information in predicting responses to anastrozole in terms of its therapeutic and adverse effects. Nevertheless, more studies are required before the knowledge of its pharmacogenomics can be applied to the individualization of treatment to ensure that patients receive the maximum benefits. Therefore, future analyses, including but not limited to genome-wide association studies, are encouraged to address some of the gray areas in the pharmacogenomics of anastrozole therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer cases; this will help in providing guidance for future pharmacogenomics protocols when anastrozole is utilized in patients' management.
    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects
  3. Kong WY, Leedman P, Irish A
    Intern Med J, 2014 Sep;44(9):932-4.
    PMID: 25201428 DOI: 10.1111/imj.12022
    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects*
  4. Sivalingam N, Pathmalingam A
    Singapore Med J, 1999 Jun;40(6):402-4.
    PMID: 10489508
    Endometrial changes have been observed when tamoxifen is used as an adjuvant therapy for carcinoma of the breast in postmenopausal women with positive estrogen receptors status.
    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects*
  5. Choo SB, Saifulbahri A, Zullkifli SN, Fadzil ML, Redzuan AM, Abdullah N, et al.
    Climacteric, 2019 04;22(2):175-181.
    PMID: 30556740 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1540563
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and severity of menopausal symptoms and their associated risk factors among postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy.

    METHODS: Postmenopausal breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy were recruited at three hospitals in Malaysia. Presence and severity of menopausal symptoms were determined using the Menopause Rating Scale. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from medical records.

    RESULTS: A total of 192 patients participated in this study. Commonly reported symptoms were musculoskeletal pain (59.9%), physical and mental exhaustion (59.4%), and hot flushes (41.1%). Multivariate analyses indicated that increasing number of years after menopause until the start of endocrine therapy was significantly associated with less likelihood of reporting menopausal symptoms and musculoskeletal pain. Patients with primary or secondary education levels reported significantly less menopausal urogenital symptoms compared to patients with a tertiary education level. Patients using aromatase inhibitors were twice as likely to experience musculoskeletal pain compared to patients using tamoxifen (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.50; p 

    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects*
  6. Lim IL, Loo AVP, Subrayan V, Khang TF, See MH, Alip A, et al.
    Breast, 2018 Jun;39:117-122.
    PMID: 29660599 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.003
    It is now increasingly common for breast cancer patients to receive adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for a period of up to 10 years. As survival rate increases, managing tamoxifen ocular toxicities is important for patients' quality of life. Macular pigments in photoreceptor cells protect against free radical damage, which can cause macular degeneration. By reducing macular pigment concentration, tamoxifen may increase the risk of macular degeneration. Here, we compared macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and central macular thickness between breast cancer patients on tamoxifen adjuvant therapy (n = 70), and a control group (n = 72). Multiple regression analysis indicated that MPOD decreases with increasing tamoxifen dosage, up to a threshold of about 20 g, after which MPOD plateaus out. Mean MPOD in the treatment group (mean = 0.40) was significantly lower (p-value = 0.02) compared to the control group (mean = 0.47) for the left eye, and for the right eye (treatment mean = 0.39; control mean = 0.48; p-value = 0.009). No significant difference in mean central macular thickness was found between the treatment and the control group (p-values > 0.4). In the control group, MPOD and central macular thickness showed significant correlation (r∼0.30; p-values 
    Matched MeSH terms: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links