Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Cameron NA, Khan SS, Bairey Merz CN, Brewer LC, Davis MM, Ferranti EP, et al.
    Circulation, 2026 Oct 26.
    PMID: 42929153 DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001481
    Improving cardiovascular health in women is an urgent public health priority given the persistent and pervasive gaps in awareness, prevention, and management of cardiovascular disease in this population. Advances in scientific understanding have led to increased recognition of female-specific considerations in cardiovascular disease, which informed the development of the Female Life Stage construct by the American Heart Association in collaboration with the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. This construct integrates assessment of hormonal, psychosocial, and cardiovascular health across life stages. However, gaps remain in operationalizing this construct and optimizing the delivery of patient-centered, interdisciplinary care among women. Over the past several decades, women's cardiovascular centers have emerged as leaders, expanded rapidly, and elevated the recognition of cardiovascular diseases that exclusively, disproportionately, or differently affect women (eg, myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, Takotsubo syndrome). In this science advisory, we describe the current landscape of women's cardiovascular centers and propose a national infrastructure to support the expansion of dedicated Comprehensive Centers of Excellence for Women's Cardiovascular Care. These centers are conceptualized as interdisciplinary care models comprising 4 defining pillars: interdisciplinary clinical care, education and training, research, and community engagement. By establishing integrated pathways that span clinical disciplines, these centers can reduce fragmentation, enhance earlier risk identification, and expand opportunities to increase representation of women in clinical research. In doing so, they offer a bold opportunity for a scalable and equitable model to improve cardiovascular health for all women.
  2. Gibson CM, Steg PG, Bahit MC, Al-Lamee R, Mehta SR, Mehran R, et al.
    N Engl J Med, 2026 Oct 22;395(16):1575-1584.
    PMID: 42670965 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2608717
    BACKGROUND: Patients are at increased risk for recurrent ischemic events after an acute coronary syndrome event. Milvexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, may reduce the risk of major adverse clinical events with minimal bleeding risk.

    METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of milvexian when added to standard antiplatelet therapy within 7 days after an acute coronary syndrome event. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral milvexian (25 mg twice daily) or matched placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke as evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. The principal safety outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3c or 5 bleeding (intracranial or intraocular bleeding that compromises vision or fatal bleeding).

    RESULTS: After a planned interim analysis that was based on 556 adjudicated efficacy end points, the trial was terminated for futility. A total of 14,194 patients had been enrolled, with 7094 assigned to receive milvexian and 7100 to receive placebo. After a median follow-up of 12.2 months, a primary efficacy outcome event had occurred in 384 patients (5.4%) in the milvexian group and in 365 patients (5.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.21; P = 0.50). BARC type 3c or 5 bleeding occurred in 23 patients (0.3%) in the milvexian group and in 22 patients (0.3%) in the placebo group (P = 0.88).

    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome event, milvexian did not decrease the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke but did not increase the risk of intracranial or fatal bleeding, as compared with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and Bristol Myers Squibb; LIBREXIA ACS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05754957.).

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links