Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Lo TS, Alzabedi A, Jhang LS, Hsieh WC, Kamarudin M, Rellora LE
    Int Urogynecol J, 2024 Oct;35(10):2045-2054.
    PMID: 39284970 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05918-w
    INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To assess the outcomes of mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) and identify risk factors for persistent USI (P-USI).

    METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 84 women who underwent a staged approach to MUS for USI after PRS for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification III and IV). The primary outcome was objective cure rate, defined by negative urine leakage on urodynamic study and a 1-h pad test weight of 

  2. Lo TS, Rellora LE, Yu CC, Ro AL, Li CW, Hsieh WC
    Int Urogynecol J, 2026 Aug;37(8):2387-2397.
    PMID: 41609832 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-026-06535-5
    INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) category on objective and subjective cure following single incision sling (SIS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The secondary aim was to compare outcomes among different SIS types within and across BMI categories.

    METHODS: This retrospective study included 636 women (mean age 57.4 ± 10.4 years) with urodynamic SUI who underwent SIS using the Ophira, Solyx, or I-stop mini between 2015 and 2023. Patients were stratified into BMI categories: normal (

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links