The present study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of a new apixaban generic with reference formulation. Twenty-six healthy volunteers were recruited for an open-label, balanced, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, 2-period, single oral dose study. Following overnight fasting, each volunteer received 5 mg of apixaban test and reference formulations as single doses, separated by a 1-week washout period. Twenty blood samples were collected at predose and multiple time points between 0.5 and 72 hours after dosing. A validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry detection method following a protein precipitation step was implemented to determine apixaban concentrations. Noncompartmental analysis was used to derive the pharmacokinetic parameters, which were then compared between the test and reference products using a multivariate analysis of variance. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test product were not statistically different from the reference product, and the 90% confidence intervals of apixaban natural log-transformed area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and maximum concentration were within 80%-125% based on the bioequivalence acceptance range criteria. The test and reference formulations of apixaban are bioequivalent in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
A newly developed branded generic of a moxifloxacin (MOX) 400-mg tablet formulation was manufactured prior to this study. A bioequivalence (BE) study was done to assess the pharmacokinetics of the formulation using a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover, 2-sequence, and single-dose experiment. Thirty healthy male volunteers were recruited. The test formulation, Flonoxin 400 mg, was compared with the reference formulation, Avelox 400 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MOX were calculated based on the plasma drug concentration-time profile. Noncompartmental analysis was performed to determine its safety and tolerability. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 88.5%-104.6%, 96.1%-101.1%, and 96.8%-100.7% for Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-inf , respectively. All CIs were within the 80.0%-125.0% boundary, thus fulfilling the acceptable BE criteria according to the ASEAN guidelines.