METHOD: This study is part of the longitudinal ageing study in Malaysia (LRGS Ageless and TUA). We assessed 815 older adults in 2014, with successful follow-up of 402 participants (mean age: 67.08±5.38 years) after 5 years. Frailty subtypes were assessed at baseline, and transitions were evaluated at the 5-year mark.
RESULTS: At baseline, the prevalence of older adults categorised as robust, physical frailty, cognitive frailty, and psychological frailty was 26.7%, 36.3%, 12.1%, and 16.7%, respectively, with 8.1% exhibiting concurrent psychological and cognitive frailty. Follow-up results showed that 22.9% remained robust, 46.8% experienced no change, 24.9% deteriorated (adversed), and 5.5% improved (reversed). Logistic regression analysis identified living alone ( p<0.001), increased body fat percentage p<0.05), increased waist circumference (p<0.05), reduced fat-free mass (p<0.05), decreased lower limb flexibility (p<0.05), and declined cardiorespiratory fitness (p<0.05) as significant predictors of frailty deterioration. Higher Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and improved Timed Up and Go and Chair Stand test results (p<0.05) were significantly associated with the reversal of frailty subtypes. (p<0.05). Younger older adults (p<0.001), males (p<0.05), those with lower WHO Disability Scale scores (p<0.05), and higher MMSE scores (p<0.05) were significantly less likely to develop frailty subtypes.
CONCLUSION: Intervention strategies that focus on combined physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functions are crucial for both reversing and preventing the progression of frailty subtypes in older adults.