Introduction: Cognitive distortion seems to be a potential force in shaping criminals and antisocial behaviour within an individual. Unfortunately there is no valid Malay psychometric instrument available to measure cognitive distortion in Malaysian settings, especially in prisons. There is an urgent need to have a valid and reliable Malay psychometric instrument to assess the cognitive distortion among Malaysians. Therefore, the present study aimed to validate “How I Think” Questionnaire into the Malay language (henceforth, HIT-M). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among inmates (n= 150) incarcerated within two prisons in Peninsular Malaysia. The validation study commenced with Forward-Backward translations and was followed by content and face validities. Later, construct validity was
performed via Exploratory Factor Analysis using Principal Component Analysis. Varimax rotation was applied in order to optimize the factor loadings on the extracted component. Finally, reliability testing was
performed to determine the internal consistency of the items which was done using Cronbach Alpha coefficient method (α). Findings: Initial factor loadings resulted in 11 factors with a total variance of 74.1%. Next, factor analysis was repeated by extracting the items into a four factor structure parallel to the theoretical construct. Items with factor loadings above 0.40 were retained as acceptable factor loadings. After considering factor loadings, item correlation and content of items, the final version of HIT-M consisted of 24 items. The internal consistency of HIT-M was 0.90 which was considered good. Conclusion: HIT-M is a valid and reliable psychometric instrument to measure and assess cognitive distortion among Malaysians.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors for sex offenders. Methods: This is a cross sectional study comparing two groups using a combination of survey methodology and personal interviews. The data was collected over a period of six months from January 2004 until June 2004. All convicted sex offenders in respective prisons who are available until July 2004 was included in the study. A control group of non-sex offenders were chosen from the same prisons. The non-sex offenders were matched to the sex offenders group in term of the length of their sentence. Data was gathered using the self generated questionnaire, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III-R, SCID and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaires. Results: Religion, education level, history of physical abuse and no history of substance abuse and dependence towards sex offenders. Conclusion: Offenders who only committed sexual offences have some characteristics which differ from other sex offenders who committed non sexual offences as well. Low or no formal education, had history of physical abuse were associated with sex offenders. No history of substance abuse and dependence were associated with no sex offenders.
The subject of euthanasia has generated many controversial debates, particularly on its legality. This has been primarily due to the doctrine of sanctity of life which is a predominant principle in many religions and is embedded in moral values. The underlying precept is that human life is sacred and demands respect, as all life comes from God and life can only be taken away intentionally through due process of law. Thus, ending a person's life, even upon his or her request, is considered in many jurisdictions as a criminal offence. Irrespective of humanitarian motives, a doctor who aids a patient in this act will be in breach of his unequivocal duty as a doctor and considered to have committed an unlawful act, which will subject him to legal sanctions. Countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Turkey have explicit legal provisions banning, in particular, active euthanasia, while countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and certain states in the U.S have taken positive steps to legalise euthanasia in certain aspects. The ethical codes and laws in Malaysia have yet to develop to the fullest extent in dealing with these issues. Although Malaysian statutory legislation contains provisions banning active euthanasia, the legal position on passive euthanasia remains implicit. In the absence of indicative legal provisions and judicial precedents governing certain matters arising, it has been the practice of the Malaysian courts to refer to relevant legal principles inherent in English cases. As Islam is proclaimed as the country's official religion, the Islamic perspective is also an important and influential factor in the development of the legal framework in Malaysia as a whole. Thus, there is a need for the existence of a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework governing the legality of euthanasia in Malaysia.