Displaying publications 61 - 63 of 63 in total

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Effendi-Tenang I, Tan MP, Khaliddin N, Jamaluddin Ahmad M, Amir NN, Kamaruzzaman SB, et al.
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2020 06 26;90:104165.
    PMID: 32650156 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104165
    INTRODUCTION: Published literature on vision impairment and cognitive function amongst older Malaysians remains scarce. This study investigates the association between vision impairment and cognitive function in an older Malaysian population.

    METHODS: Subjects aged 55 years and above from the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR) study with available information on vision and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were included. Data were obtained through a home-based interview and hospital-based health check by trained researchers. Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with logMAR score with vision impairment defined as VA 6/18 or worse in the better-seeing eye. Cognition was evaluated using the MoCA-Blind scoring procedure. Those with a MoCA-Blind score of <19/22 were considered to have cognitive impairment.

    RESULTS: Data was available for 1144 participants, mean (SD) age = 68.57 (±7.23) years. Vision impairment was present in 143 (12.5 %) and 758 (66.3 %) had MoCA-Blind score of <19. Subjects with vision impairment were less likely to have a MoCA-Blind score of ≥19 (16.8 % vs 36.2 %, p < 0.001). Vision impairment was associated with poorer MoCA-Blind scores after adjustments for age, gender, and ethnicity (β = 2.064; 95 % CI, -1.282 to 3.320; P = 0.003). In those who had > 6 years of education attainment, vision impairment was associated with a significant reduction of cognitive function and remained so after adjustment for age and gender (β = 1.863; 95 % CI, 1.081-3.209; P = 0.025).

    CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that vision impairment correlates with cognitive decline. Therefore, maintaining good vision is an important interventional strategy for preventing cognitive decline in older adults.

  2. Loke YK, Hwang SL, Tan MH
    Ann Acad Med Singap, 1997 May;26(3):285-9.
    PMID: 9285018
    The objectives of this study were to evaluate the time delays between the onset of symptoms and admission to hospital and provision of thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction; and to examine the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis and the therapeutic decision on thrombolysis in these patients. An observational study of 96 patients with suspected myocardial infarction was undertaken over a period of 15 months in the Coronary Care Unit of Hospital Kuala Terengganu. Seventy per cent of the patients arrived in the hospital within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms. After arrival in the emergency room, it took a median time of 85 minutes before the administration of thrombolytic therapy. Of the 67 patients who were given thrombolysis, 46 were treated within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms. About a quarter of patients said that they had delayed seeking treatment at the hospital. Treatment delays occurring in the hospital were mainly due to admission procedures as well as late diagnosis. Eighty-one patients had confirmed myocardial infarction of whom 59 received thrombolytic therapy. Eight patients receiving thrombolytic therapy had no confirmation of myocardial infarctions. Improvements in diagnostic accuracy and reduction of delays in the provision of thrombolytic therapy could be achieved by better training of health care staff as well as by further streamlining of admission procedures.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links