Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Abdul Hafidz MI, Haron H, Abdul Wahab MZ
    Kidney360, 2024 Aug 01;5(8):1193-1196.
    PMID: 39207893 DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000510
  2. Gan CC, Jalalonmuhali M, Nordin NZ, Abdul Wahab MZ, Yahya R, Ng KP, et al.
    Transplant Proc, 2021 Apr;53(3):856-864.
    PMID: 33487455 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.038
    Malaysia has a low deceased-donor donation rate and has not embarked on a paired kidney exchange program; therefore, ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible transplantation remain the main contributor to the sustainability of the national kidney transplantation (KT) program. There were 26 cases of ABO-incompatible KTs performed from 2011 to 2018 in 3 major transplant centers, namely, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, University Malaya Medical Centre, and Prince Court Medical Centre. We collected perioperative and follow-up data through June 2019. The desensitization protocol varies and is center specific: the localized Japanese protocol and Swedish protocol with a target anti-A/B isoagglutinin titer of 16 or 32 on the day of transplant. The induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance protocol was nearly identical. The median follow-up time was 62.3 months (interquartile range, 37.0-79.7). Fifteen subjects had the highest predesensitization anti-A/B titer of ≥32 (57.7%). The acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection incidence were 12.5% (3 cases) and 8.3% (2 cases), respectively. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival rates were 96.2%, 92.3%, and 96.0%, respectively, 1 year post-living-donor KT (LDKT) and 96.2%, 87.2%, and 90.7%, respectively, 5 years post-LDKT. Our experience shows that ABO-incompatible LDKT using a suitable desensitization technique could be a safe and feasible choice for LDKT even with varied desensitization regimens for recipients with relatively high baseline isoagglutinin titers.
  3. Tan MH, Wan Ahmad Kamil WMR, Cheng MC, Yee SY, Abdul Wahab MZ, Yahya R, et al.
    Transplant Proc, 2021 Dec 25.
    PMID: 34963514 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.11.020
    Promising outcomes of kidney transplantation following hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation has been reported. Data from some centers have demonstrated stable graft function without long term immunosuppression. We present our experience with the first successful case in Malaysia. This is a 21-year-old man who had acute myeloid leukemia, received stem cell transplant from his younger brother 8 years prior, underwent kidney transplantation from the same donor, and had an excellent 1-year graft function post-transplant. As the post-transplant genetic analysis revealed full chimerism, his immunosuppression regimen can be tapered to minimal doses safely. The concept of immunotolerance is now widely studied and could potentially be the curative strategy for patients who develop end stage kidney disease after hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation.
  4. Ng YM, Lim YS, Ee LW, Fong VK, Low CL, Yee SY, et al.
    Transplant Proc, 2022 Jan 29.
    PMID: 35105465 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.002
    BACKGROUND: The Malaysian Kidney Allocation System implemented in 2020 includes only kidney transplant candidates with estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) score of ≤20%, in replacement of Malaysian Organs Sharing System, which was based solely on dialysis vintage. We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) with EPTS ≤20% to those with EPTS >20%.

    METHODS: All DDKTRs between January 1, 2015, and December 29, 2020, were included and categorized into 2 groups: EPTS ≤20% and EPTS >20%. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association of EPTS score and patient survival. The rate of postoperative complications, graft failure and patient survival were compared between 2 groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS v26 and R v4.0.4. The study complies with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration.

    RESULTS: We included 159 DDKTRs, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 10-60 months). The mean age of those with EPTS ≤20% was 32.2 ± 3.4 years and those with EPTS >20% was 46.0 ± 6.7 years, and the median EPTS score were 16% (range, 12%-18%) and 38% (range, 27%-56.5%), respectively. EPTS score was associated with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.031; 95% CI 1.010-1.052; P = .003), and the cutoff points of 30% and above were associated with worse survival. It showed good discrimination (C-index, 0.729; 95% CI 0.579-0.878; P = .003) and the optimal cutoff value was 38% (65.5% sensitivity, 68.8% specificity, 17.8% positive predictive value, and 95.8% negative predictive value). Both groups had similar rate of surgical complications (P = .191), graft failure (P = .503), and patient survival (P = .654), but those with EPTS >20% had higher incidence of urinary tract infection (9.3% vs 27.6%, P = .016).

    CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in clinical outcomes using an EPTS cutoff point of 20% but worse patient survival if higher cutoff point was used.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links