Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon JK, Wa CTC, Villa MA
    Int J Surg, 2017 Aug;44:260-268.
    PMID: 28648795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073
    BACKGROUND: Of the many antimicrobial agents available, iodophore-based formulations such as povidone iodine have remained popular after decades of use for antisepsis and wound healing applications due to their favorable efficacy and tolerability. Povidone iodine's broad spectrum of activity, ability to penetrate biofilms, lack of associated resistance, anti-inflammatory properties, low cytotoxicity and good tolerability have been cited as important factors, and no negative effect on wound healing has been observed in clinical practice. Over the past few decades, numerous reports on the use of povidone iodine have been published, however, many of these studies are of differing design, endpoints, and quality. More recent data clearly supports its use in wound healing.

    METHODS: Based on data collected through PubMed using specified search criteria based on above topics and clinical experience of the authors, this article will review preclinical and clinical safety and efficacy data on the use of povidone iodine in wound healing and its implications for the control of infection and inflammation, together with the authors' advice for the successful treatment of acute and chronic wounds.

    RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Povidone iodine has many characteristics that position it extraordinarily well for wound healing, including its broad antimicrobial spectrum, lack of resistance, efficacy against biofilms, good tolerability and its effect on excessive inflammation. Due to its rapid, potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, and favorable risk/benefit profile, povidone iodine is expected to remain a highly effective treatment for acute and chronic wounds in the foreseeable future.

  2. Nair HKR, Norlizah P, Mariam MN, Alsagoff SAL, Ming Long K, Anantha KR, et al.
    PMID: 35345926 DOI: 10.1177/15347346221090096
    Healthcare resource utilization for Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in Malaysia needs to be clarified. This modified Delphi panel study aimed to describe the clinical pathways for diabetic foot ulcer in Malaysia and to define the healthcare resources used and their costs. A systematic review of the literature was carried out on the management of diabetic foot ulcer in Malaysia. A modified Delphi panel involving 7 local experts was organized to validate the statements, in order to arrive at a consensus on the resources used for the treatment of DFU patients in Malaysia and their costs. A Markov model was then used to estimate the financial burden of DFU patients in Malaysia.The total cost per patient per annum was MYR 5981 in public and MYR 8581 in private setting. In the public setting, outpatient visits costs represent 50% of the overall cost, followed by medical devices which represent 38% of total costs. In the private setting, as in the public, outpatient visits and devices contribute the most to overall costs with 51% and 21%, respectively. However, hospital inpatient costs are higher in private setting and represent 14% of the total costs versus 5% in public setting.These findings may prove useful for clinicians and decision makers in understanding the economic implications of managing DFUs in Malaysia and the need for innovative therapies to reduce the burden for patients but also for the society.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links