Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Fulltext Evaluation of image quality of bitewing radiographs taken by UITM dental students.
    Ayoub,A,A,, A,Rasid,L,H,, Razak,S,, Kamaruzaman,M,, Azmi,N,W,
    Compendium of Oral Science, 2020;7(1):32-40.
    MyJurnal
    Abstract
    Objectives: To evaluate the quality of bitewing radiograph taken by Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) dental
    students during daily clinical practices and to evaluate the difference in caries lesions found on bitewing
    radiographs and clinical examination.
    Materials and method: 120 patients who attended the undergraduate dental clinic for dental examination were
    included in this study. The inclusion criteria were patients within the age range of 17-45 years old, possessing
    at least three sets of posterior teeth, with bitewing radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students. The
    number of caries lesions detected by clinical examination, bitewing radiographs, and a combination of both
    methods were recorded. The quality of 240 bitewing radiographs was classified into three categories; excellent,
    acceptable, and unacceptable. The frequency of radiographic errors; foreshortening/elongation, horizontal
    overlapping, inadequate film coverage, non-ideal centering and inadequate contrast and density were also
    evaluated.
    Results: The quality of bitewing radiographs are mostly accepted to be used as a diagnostic tool and one of the
    factors which commonly affected the quality of the bitewing is the overlapping of adjacent teeth. The highest
    number of caries lesions were detected radiographically (74%) compared with 25% caries by clinical
    examination. The majority of radiographs (71%, n=171) were deemed to be of acceptable quality, 39(16%) were
    excellent, and 30(13%) were diagnostically unacceptable. “Horizontal overlap” was the most common error
    detected on the radiographs (n=139, 57.9%), followed by “non-ideal centering” (n=93, 38.8%), “inadequate
    contrast” (n=46, 19.2%) and “inadequate film coverage” (n=24,10%). The highest number of caries lesions were
    detected radiographically (74%) compared with 25% caries by clinical examination.
    Conclusion: The quality of the majority of bitewing radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students in this
    institution is acceptable. However, given that more than half of the radiographs possessed horizontal
    overlapping error, caries diagnosis may have been underestimated. Further training and periodic audits are
    required to reduce the percentage of errors in bitewing radiographs amongst undergraduate dental students.
  2. Application of a new system for classifying root canal morphology in undergraduate teaching and clinical practice: a national survey in Malaysia
    Ahmed HMA, Che Ab Aziz ZA, Azami NH, Farook MS, Khan AA, Mohd Noor NS, et al.
    Int Endod J, 2020 Jun;53(6):871-879.
    PMID: 32003029 DOI: 10.1111/iej.13271
    AIM: To evaluate and compare the feedback of final year undergraduate dental students in eight Malaysian dental schools on the application of a new system for classifying root canal morphology in teaching and clinical practice.

    METHODS: One PowerPoint presentation describing two classification systems for root canal morphology (Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology, 1974 38, 456 and its supplemental configurations, International Endodontic Journal 2017, 50, 761) was delivered to final year undergraduate dental students in eight dental schools in Malaysia by two presenters (each presented to four schools). To examine students' feedback on the utility of each system, printed questionnaires consisting of six questions (five multiple choice questions and one open-ended question) were distributed and collected after the lecture. The questionnaire was designed to compare the classification systems in terms of accuracy, practicability, understanding of root canal morphology and recommendation for use in pre-clinical and clinical courses. The exact test was used for statistical analysis, with the level of significance set at 0.05 (P = 0.05).

    RESULTS: A total of 382 (out of 447) students participated giving a response rate of 86%. More than 90% of students reported that the new system was more accurate and more practical compared with the Vertucci system (P  0.05). The students' responses for all questions were almost similar for both presenters (P > 0.05).

    CONCLUSIONS: The new system of International Endodontic Journal 2017, 50, 761 for classifying root and canal morphology was favoured by final year undergraduate dental students in Malaysia. The new system has the potential to be included in the undergraduate endodontic curriculum for teaching courses related to root and canal morphology.

Related Terms
    Try searching for something
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links