Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Looi JC, Allison S, Woon L, Bastiampillai T
    Australas Psychiatry, 2024 Feb;32(1):55-58.
    PMID: 37903482 DOI: 10.1177/10398562231211129
    OBJECTIVE: There are many burgeoning treatments, and a large range of therapeutic options for 21st century psychiatry. This paper briefly comments upon considerations for balancing treatment to suit the patient, their illness, and their milieu.

    CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic equipoise, for psychiatric care, is an aspiration rather than a position easily achieved. In day-to-day clinical practice, there will be unexpected demands and barriers that cannot always be accommodated or surmounted. Psychiatrists can work collaboratively with patients, carers, and colleagues in conceptualising and care-planning to avoid extremes of therapeutic hubris and despair, and to adapt evidence-based care more effectively so that it is suited to the patient and their circumstances.

  2. Woon LS, Allison S, Bastiampillai T, Kisely S, Maguire P, Pring W, et al.
    Australas Psychiatry, 2024 Mar 04.
    PMID: 38438122 DOI: 10.1177/10398562241237128
    OBJECTIVE: Telepsychiatry items in the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) were expanded following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their out-of-pocket costs have not been examined. We describe and compare patient out-of-pocket payments for face-to-face and telepsychiatry (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for outpatient psychiatric services to understand the differential out-of-pocket cost burden for patients across these modalities.

    METHODS: out-of-pocket cost information was obtained from the Medical Costs Finder website, which extracted data from Services Australia's Medicare claims data in 2021-2022. Cost information for corresponding face-to-face, video, and telephone MBS items for outpatient psychiatric services was compared, including (1) Median specialist fees; (2) Median out-of-pocket payments; (3) Medicare reimbursement amounts; and (4) Proportions of patients subject to out-of-pocket fees.

    RESULTS: Medicare reimbursements are identical for all comparable face-to-face and telepsychiatry items. Specialist fees for comparable items varied across face-to-face to telehealth options, with resulting differences in out-of-pocket costs. For video items, higher proportions of patients were not bulk-billed, with greater out-of-pocket costs than face-to-face items. However, the opposite was true for telephone items compared with face-to-face items.

    CONCLUSIONS: Initial cost analyses of MBS telepsychiatry items indicate that telephone consultations incur the lowest out-of-pocket costs, followed by face-to-face and video consultations.

  3. Woon LS, Maguire PA, Reay RE, Mittinty M, Bastiampillai T, Looi JCL
    Aust Health Rev, 2024 Dec;48(6):617-625.
    PMID: 39433299 DOI: 10.1071/AH24196
    Objective Telepsychiatry consultations grew rapidly with increased total consultations and reduced face-to-face consultations following the pandemic-triggered expansion of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items. It was unclear how much telehealth expansion independently impacted overall and face-to-face consultation trends after accounting for lockdown severity. Methods We extracted monthly MBS Item Reports for psychiatric consultations (January 2012-December 2023). The monthly average Stringency Index (SI) for Australia represented lockdown severity from January 2020 to December 2022. A dichotomous variable denoted telehealth expansion (March 2020 onward). We constructed consecutive multiple linear regression models for combined consultations and face-to-face consultations to include seasonality, trend, SI, and telehealth expansion. We compared model performance using information criteria. Results Median monthly total consultations increased from 148,413 (Interquartile range, IQR: 138,219-153,709) pre-expansion (January 2012-February 2020) to 173,016 (IQR: 158,292-182,463) post-expansion (March 2020-December 2023). Contrarily, median monthly face-to-face consultations decreased from 143,726 (IQR: 135,812-150,153) to 99,272 (IQR: 87,513-107,778). Seasonality and trend were present in both time series. The time series regression model with expansion but excluding SI best explained all consultations, while both telehealth expansion and SI were significant in the best-fit model for face-to-face consultations. Conclusion MBS telehealth expansion was associated with total and face-to-face consultations independent of lockdown severity changes. Policy changes allowing wider access to new telehealth services have possibly led to increased uptake of psychiatric care and addressed previously unmet needs.
  4. Looi JC, Amos A, Loi S, Bastiampillai T, Reutens S, Woon L, et al.
    Australas Psychiatry, 2024 Apr;32(2):113-117.
    PMID: 38342996 DOI: 10.1177/10398562241232749
  5. Looi JC, Allison S, Bastiampillai T, Kisely S, Maguire PA, Woon LS, et al.
    Australas Psychiatry, 2024 Sep 06.
    PMID: 39240731 DOI: 10.1177/10398562241282377
    OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines suggest that the overall quantity and duration of antidepressant prescriptions should be reduced. In this paper, we comment on the evidence both for and against this view.

    METHODS: We critically review the arguments proposed by proponents of antidepressant deprescribing in the context of the evidence-base for the treatment of depression.

    RESULTS: Proponents of deprescribing do not address the substantive issues of whether inappropriate prescribing has been demonstrated, and when prescribing is needed. Their arguments for deprescribing are rebutted in this context.

    CONCLUSIONS: Whether or not to deprescribe antidepressant medication needs to take into consideration the risk-benefit profile of the decision, the responsibility for which needs to be shared and based on the context of the patient's depression, their preferences, experiences and perspectives.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links