Although classified as an AIDS-defining illness, several reports show histoplasmosis also affects patients living with cancers including haematological malignancies and solid tumours. However, reviews describing cases of histoplasmosis in malignancies are lacking in the literature. We identified a total of thirty-four cases with twenty (58.8 %) cases reported from the USA, four from Brazil (11.8 %), three from India (8.8 %), and one each from Singapore (2.9 %), France (2.9 %), Netherlands (2.9 %), Colombia (2.9 %), Canada (2.9 %), Morocco (2.9 %), and Malaysia (2.9 %). 82.4 % (n = 28) of the cases were adults. Presenting symptoms were majorly fever (61.7 %), lymphadenopathy (50.0 %) and weight loss (29.4 %). Essential haematologic findings were pancytopaenia (n = 7, 20.6 %), neutropenia (n = 2, 5.9 %) and anaemia (n = 5, 14.7 %). The associated cancers were predominantly haematological and comprised 73.5 % (n = 25) of all cases. The diagnosis of histoplasmosis was via histopathology (n = 23, 67.6%), culture (n = 13, 38.2%), Histoplasma antigen assay (n = 13, 38.2%), anti-Histoplasma antibody assay (n = 5, 14.7%), PCR and sequencing (n = 2, 5.9%), peripheral blood film/direct microscopy (n = 4, 11.8%) and cytology (n = 1, 2.9%). Of the thirty-four cases, twenty-four (70.6%) had favourable outcomes, eight (23.5%) died, one (2.9%) was lost to follow-up and in one (2.9%) case, the outcome was not stated. Histoplasmosis is not an uncommon opportunistic disease complicating malignancies but is paradoxically underdiagnosed in Africa given the huge burden of cancers in that region. Besides following chemotherapy and the use of steroids, tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists therapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and environmental exposure were factors associated with Histoplasma infection in patients with malignancies. A resolution to promptly screen suspected or confirmed cases of malignancies for histoplasmosis will improve diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
Radical new possibilities of improved treatment of cancer are on offer from an advanced medical technology already demonstrating its significance: next-generation sequencing (NGS). This refined testing provides unprecedentedly precise diagnoses and permits the use of focused and highly personalized treatments. However, across regions globally, many cancer patients will continue to be denied the benefits of NGS as long as some of the yawning gaps in its implementation remain unattended. The challenges at the regional and national levels are linked because putting the solutions into effect is highly dependent on cooperation between regional- and national-level cooperation, which could be hindered by shortfalls in interpretation or understanding. The aim of the paper was to define and explore the necessary conditions for NGS and make recommendations for effective implementation based on extensive exchanges with policy makers and stakeholders. As a result, the European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM) developed a maturity framework structured around demand-side and supply-side issues to enable interested stakeholders in different countries to self-evaluate according to a common matrix. A questionnaire was designed to identify the current status of NGS implementation, and it was submitted to different experts in different institutions globally. This revealed significant variability in the different aspects of NGS uptake. Within different regions globally, to ensure those conditions are right, this can be improved by linking efforts made at the national level, where patients have needs and where care is delivered, and at the global level, where major policy initiatives in the health field are underway or in preparation, many of which offer direct or indirect pathways for building those conditions. In addition, in a period when consensus is still incomplete and catching up is needed at a political level to ensure rational allocation of resources-even within individual countries-to enable the best ways to make the necessary provisions for NGS, a key recommendation is to examine where closer links between national and regional actions could complement, support, and mutually reinforce efforts to improve the situation for patients.