To show the feasibility of performing human telesurgery robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) between two countries using low-latency ultra-long-distance connectivity. This study described the outcomes of performing RARP on a man in his 60's with localized intermediate-risk prostatic adenocarcinoma located in Kuwait City while the surgeon (SA) was approximately 7000 kilometers (Km) away at Toumai robotic surgical system (TRSS) headquarters in Shanghai. Operative and connectivity details were reported. RARP was performed in December 2024. There were no major clinical or technical problems encountered during the procedure. The average round-trip latency (RTL) was 181.4 milliseconds (ms) using fiber optic broadband network with 5G network as back-up. On the Shanghai end two wired broadband networks were employed as back-up to ensure patient safety. There was an experienced fellowship-trained robotic surgeon (AA) in the operating room in Kuwait capable of taking over in case of clinical or connectivity issues. There were no reported complications. The patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2. Final pathology described Gleason score 7(3 + 4), ISUP 2, and negative surgical margins (pT2Nx). The catheter was removed on POD 9, and the patient was continent a week later. His serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was undetectable seven weeks post-operatively. This study described the feasibility of human RARP telesurgery between two countries using low-latency, long-distance fiber optic broadband network with 5G network as back-up with successful clinical outcomes. There is a need to establish robust legal and regulatory framework to allow wider international expansion of telesurgery.
An estimated 160 million additional surgical procedures are required annually to address unmet surgical need globally, with the greatest deficits occurring in low- and middle-income countries. While telesurgery has re-emerged as a feasible model for delivering remote operative expertise, its broader implementation remains constrained by unresolved technical, ethical, regulatory, educational, and governance challenges. We aimed to develop an international multidisciplinary consensus framework to guide the safe, equitable, and scalable implementation of telesurgery and remote surgical education. A Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS)-supported accelerated Delphi consensus process was conducted between February and March 2026. Candidate statements were generated through a comprehensive literature review and refined by a multidisciplinary working group of clinicians, engineers, industry representatives, regulators, and healthcare leaders who convened at a telesurgery conference in Orlando, in February 2026. A three-round electronic Delphi survey was performed using a 7-point Likert scale across nine predefined domains: (1) Global Need, Ethics & Humanitarian Rationale; (2) Technical Infrastructure, Connectivity & Network Performance; (3) Cybersecurity & Data Protection; (4) Surgeon Credentialing, Training & Skill Maintenance; (5) Safety Protocols, Human Factors & Team Dynamics; (6) Clinical Indications, Case Selection & Procedural Scope; (7) Regulatory, Legal, Licensure & Liability; (8) Economics, Administration & Reimbursement; and (9) Industry Responsibilities, Research & Global Roadmap. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% agreement (Likert scores 5-7). A total of 153 international experts participated in Round 1, including surgeons, engineers, industry representatives, hospital administrators, and regulatory stakeholders. Participant retention was 79.1% from Round 1 to Round 2 and 90.1% from Round 2 to Round 3. Of 86 core recommendation statements, 83 (96.6%) achieved consensus after three rounds. Consensus was strongest in cybersecurity, safety protocols, clinical indications, regulatory governance, economics, and industry responsibilities, where all statements reached agreement. Three statements failed to achieve consensus, relating to procedure-specific latency thresholds, dual-site credentialing requirements, and telesurgery as a preferred intervention when alternative treatments are available. Four additional terminology statements defining telesurgery, tele-mentoring, tele-proctoring, and tele-preceptoring achieved consensus after a single Delphi round, providing provisional standardized definitions for the field. To our knowledge, this is among the first multidisciplinary consensus frameworks to integrate clinical implementation, remote surgical education, cybersecurity, regulation, economics, and governance within a single Delphi exercise. The findings position telesurgery not only as a model for remote operative care but also as a platform for global surgical education, mentorship, workforce development, and equitable access to expertise. The framework provides a foundation for specialty society guidance, institutional implementation, regulatory development, and future international research.