Methods: We report a case of 23-year-old army personnel who presented with persistent vomiting leading to severe hypokalaemia, metabolic alkalosis, and acute kidney injury resulting in cardiorespiratory arrest.
Results: After successful resuscitation, he was supported with haemodialysis and aggressive electrolytes correction. He was repeatedly not able to tolerate nasogastric (NG) tube feeding and computerised tomography of abdomen was performed, and the diagnosis of SMA syndrome was made. Gastroscopy examination revealed duodenal ulcer at D1, pinhole D1-D2 junction, but there was no evidence of intraluminal mass or lesions leading to upper gastrointestinal obstruction. A nasojejunal tube was inserted to bypass the narrow segment of the duodenum, and he was put on nutritional support. He was subsequently weaned off dialysis support as his renal function gradually improved and later on normalised. He remains symptoms free, and he gained five kilograms in four months after discharge.
Conclusions: SMA syndrome is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal obstruction but should be considered as a differential diagnosis in a patient who presented with recurrent vomiting and AKI with metabolic alkalosis.
METHODS: All DDKTRs between January 1, 2015, and December 29, 2020, were included and categorized into 2 groups: EPTS ≤20% and EPTS >20%. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association of EPTS score and patient survival. The rate of postoperative complications, graft failure and patient survival were compared between 2 groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS v26 and R v4.0.4. The study complies with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration.
RESULTS: We included 159 DDKTRs, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 10-60 months). The mean age of those with EPTS ≤20% was 32.2 ± 3.4 years and those with EPTS >20% was 46.0 ± 6.7 years, and the median EPTS score were 16% (range, 12%-18%) and 38% (range, 27%-56.5%), respectively. EPTS score was associated with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.031; 95% CI 1.010-1.052; P = .003), and the cutoff points of 30% and above were associated with worse survival. It showed good discrimination (C-index, 0.729; 95% CI 0.579-0.878; P = .003) and the optimal cutoff value was 38% (65.5% sensitivity, 68.8% specificity, 17.8% positive predictive value, and 95.8% negative predictive value). Both groups had similar rate of surgical complications (P = .191), graft failure (P = .503), and patient survival (P = .654), but those with EPTS >20% had higher incidence of urinary tract infection (9.3% vs 27.6%, P = .016).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in clinical outcomes using an EPTS cutoff point of 20% but worse patient survival if higher cutoff point was used.