Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Tung KM, Su Y, Kang YN, Hou WH, Hoang KD, Chen KH, et al.
    J Psychosom Res, 2024 Apr 13;181:111666.
    PMID: 38657565 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111666
    OBJECTIVE: Patients often experience pain and psychological distress when undergoing elective surgeries. Mindfulness-based interventions have been proposed as potential strategies to address these challenges. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative mindfulness-based interventions on several outcomes for patients undergoing elective surgery, including preoperative anxiety/depression, postoperative anxiety/depression, postoperative pain, and quality of life (QOL).

    METHODS: This meta-analysis encompassed randomized controlled trials published in the database PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to August 2023. Mindfulness-based interventions were compared to control groups, who received treatment as usual (TAU). The RevMan software was employed to assess each outcome by using standardized mean difference based on patient-reported data. Subgroup analyses were further performed according to different categories of surgical types.

    RESULTS: Eight RCTs with a total of 685 patients were identified. This meta-analysis demonstrated significant difference in preoperative anxiety (SMD:-0.36, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.11, p = .006) and postoperative pain immediately (SMD:-0.65,95% CI: -1.09 to -0.20, p = .004), 2-3 days (SMD:-0.40, 95% CI:-0.78 to -0.02, p = .04),at 14 days (SMD:-0.48,95% CI: -0.85 to -0.12, p = .009) and 28 days (SMD:-0.89,95% CI: -1.55 to -0.23, p = .008) postoperatively. However, there were no differences between postoperative anxiety, preoperative/postoperative depression, and QOL.

    CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest preoperative mindfulness-based interventions can effectively manage preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in patients scheduled for elective surgery. Further research is warranted to explore the different timing and types of mindfulness-based intervention.

  2. Chen LY, Kang YN, Hoang KD, Chen KH, Chen C
    PMID: 39574359 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0187
    Background: Melasma is a chronic skin pigmentation disorder, and intradermal injection of tranexamic acid (TXA) is an effective treatment option for melasma with limited comparative efficacy studies. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of TXA injections with other treatment modalities for patients with melasma, as measured by Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). Methods: A total of 17 eligible randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The MASI and the modified MASI served as the primary outcome measures of treatment effectiveness. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. Results: Among the various administration routes for TXA, intradermal injection and microneedling demonstrated superior effectiveness, followed by oral administration and topical application. As for patient satisfaction, oral administration outperformed the injection method, whereas topical administration significantly underperformed injection. Furthermore, TXA injections were more effective than the majority of non-TXA standard treatments for melasma. Conclusions: This meta-analysis and systematic review suggested that intradermal TXA injection is an effective alternative for melasma treatment, with potential advantages over other administration routes.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links