Patients and Methods: Twenty-five children with ASD (mean age = 59.3 ± 8.1 months) and 28 children with TD (mean age = 63.1 ± 8.6 months) were recruited. The Actigraph accelerometer, Movement Assessment Battery for Children-second edition, and Assessment of Preschool Children's Participation were used.
Results: Young children with ASD spent significantly less time in moderate and light physical activity and exhibited more sedentary behavior than did children with TD. Those children with ASD also had greater motor difficulties and engaged less frequently in physical recreation activities compared to their TD peers. Motor performance was significantly correlated with physical activity in all children.
Conclusion: This study highlighted the specificity of the levels of physical activity, motor difficulties, and participation diversity in children with ASD comparing performances on children with TD. Additional research is needed to provide valuable information for early interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of the Motor Skill Occupational Therapy Intervention ON ASD (MOTION-ASD) and Cognitive Orientation Exercise (CO-EXC) programs to improve motor skills performance, self-care performance, and adaptive behaviors among preschool children with ASD.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial, two-group, triple-blinded, repeated-measures design Setting: University laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen preschool children with ASD (M age = 4.91 yr).
OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition, Brief Form, Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition.
RESULTS: Children in the MOTION-ASD group showed significantly greater improvements in manual coordination and overall gross and fine manual skills than those in the CO-EXC group immediately after the intervention. Significant improvements in fine manual control, body coordination, overall motor skills, and self-care performance were made throughout both interventions and were retained at the posttest and the 4-wk follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings provide supporting evidence that motor skills interventions involving fundamental skills and cognitive training may be a viable therapeutic option for treating children with ASD. The results also suggest that practitioners may consider providing structured and strategic motor skills interventions for preschool children with ASD. What This Article Adds: This study's rigorous tests of motor skills interventions support ways to manage motor difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). An intervention based on motor learning theory could benefit preschool children with ASD, especially in terms of manual coordination ability and overall gross and fine motor skills.
METHOD: Surveys (Study 1) and semi-structured interviews (Study 2) were used to collect data. Thirty-eight respondents completed the Affiliate Stigma Scale (ASS), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and Care-related Quality of Life (CarerQol) scales (GMFCS). Eleven respondents took part in semi-structured interviews, which were then thematically evaluated.
RESULTS: Parents did not feel stigmatized because they had a child with CP. However, parents needed some form of short-term relief from caregiving. After controlling for demographics, high stress respondents experienced high affiliate stigma whereas low stress respondents had better quality of life. Although the respondents with less stigma had a better quality of life, this effect was moderate. Three major themes emerged from the interviews.
CONCLUSION: Counseling, support groups, and helper services should be offered to parents. Also, healthcare professionals participating in CP rehabilitation, community-based rehabilitation, and health institutions should be educated on how to better help parents of children with CP.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide a personalized surgical recommendation that enables more confidence in advising patients to pursue surgical treatment.
METHODS: We enrolled 328 patients with uPA harboring KCNJ5 mutations (n = 158) or not (n = 170) who had undergone adrenalectomy. Eighty-seven features were collected, including demographics, various blood and urine test results, and clinical comorbidities. We designed 2 versions of the prediction model: one for institutes with complete blood tests (full version), and the other for institutes that may not be equipped with comprehensive testing facilities (condensed version).
RESULTS: The results show that in the full version, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine outperformed other classifiers, achieving area under the curve and accuracy values of 0.905 and 0.864, respectively. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine also showed excellent performance in the condensed version, achieving area under the curve and accuracy values of 0.867 and 0.803, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We simplified the preoperative diagnosis of KCNJ5 mutations successfully using machine learning. The proposed lightweight tool that requires only baseline characteristics and blood/urine test results can be widely applied and can aid personalized prediction during preoperative counseling for patients with uPA.