Many cancer patients in general require long term venous access such as chemoport for chemotherapy, as well as infusion of fluids and blood taking. However, chemoport insertions carry complications such as infection, blockage, pneumothorax and malposition.We received feedbacks regarding complications endured by patients after chemoport insertion from the respective teams managing the patients in our hospital. In view of that, we conducted a retrospective audit on the chemoport insertions which we have done.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit on the chemoport insertions which was planned for open method insertion through cephalic vein performed over the last 4 years from 2014 to 2017.Results: A total of 102 chemoports were inserted. Majority of patient’s ages are 50-59 years old. 88 (86%) of the cases were done via open method whereas another 14 cases were converted to percutaneous route. Majority of patients (55%) of the patients have breast carcinoma followed by colorectal (28%), haematological (12%) and gynaecological malignancies (5%). Complications occurred in 10 patients (rate at 9.8%). Most common complications were catheter related infection (5 cases) followed by wound infection (3 cases) and malposition (2 cases). Malposition was detected on post-operative chest radiograph and revision was done. All catheter related infection occurred in patients with haematological malignancies. Our complication rate of 9.8% is lower than the accepted complication rate of 15-25% worldwide.Conclusion: Chemoport provides a robust vascular access especially for the purpose of chemotherapy infusion. We showed with adequate training and privileging, it can be performed with very limited complications
Liver abscess can present in various manners and in some cases causes delays and misdiagnoses. We are reporting 2 cases of rare presentation of liver abscess.The first case isa64-year-old gentleman presented with right hypochondriac pain since August 2017 and diagnosed to have liver abscess. He was treated with antibiotics and serial imaging for reassessment. However, he presented again this year with right sided anterior abdominal wall swelling. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed anterior abdominal wall collection with extension into right internal and external oblique muscles with communication with liver collection at segment VII. An open incision and drainage was performed with drain inserted over the anterior abdominal wall collection. He was then referred to hepatobiliary center for further management. Second case is a30-year-old gentleman underlying Beta thalassemia major-post splenectomy with Klebsiella pneumoniabacteremia noted to have left multiseptated collection with posterobasal consolidation and left parapneumonic effusion which was initially misdiagnosed as splenic abscess. However, with further imaging was confirmed to be a left liver abscess with focal discontinuity in left hemidiaphragm, which communicates between liver abscess and enlarging left lower loculated pleural effusion. Radiological guided pigtail catheter was inserted and serial imaging showed collection decreasing in size. Extra-abdominal manifestation of a liver abscess is a rare clinical entity and is not well documented. The advent of ultrasound and CT scan, there has been improvement in the rate of early diagnosis even with these uncommon presentations. Percutaneous drainage with antimicrobial therapy remains gold standard for a non-ruptured abscess. Surgical intervention should be considered for large, complex, multi-septated abscesses or in whom percutaneous drainage has failed.
Small bowel perforation is common following blunt abdominal trauma. Intra-abdominal injury with isolated small bowel perforation however, is a rare entity and diagnosis can be ambiguous. Non-isolated small bowel perforation, which carries a higher mortality rate, will be identified early during the assessment of the patient following a blunt abdominal trauma.A case of an isolated small bowel perforation following a road traffic accident is reported. A motorcycle rider, while trying to avoid a car, lost control and skidded into a drain. Upon arrival to the Emergency Department, he was complaining of upperabdominal pain evident by abrasion and bruising of his bilateral hypochondriacs. FAST scan showed free fluid at Morrison’s pouch and a formal abdominal ultrasound confirmed minimal free fluid at Morrison’s pouch. A plain CT abdomen was done and did not show any evidence of solid organ injury but demonstrated pneumoperitoneum. In view of the persistent abdominal tenderness, open fracture of left femur, radius and ulna, and radiological findings, a laparotomy was performed which revealed an isolated 1x1cm small bowel perforation, 60cm from DJ junction with localized faecal contamination. Small bowel repair was done and patient recovered well afterward.Although challenging, due to its detrimental infectious potential, early recognition of small bowel injury is crucial. Isolated small bowel perforation, rarely without associated intra-abdominal injury, requires more investigations, delaying diagnosis to treatment period. CT abdomen has proven to be both specific and sensitive in diagnosing small bowel injuries. Even when physical examination and radiological examinations are minimal, a suspicion of small bowel perforation should be considered as delay in diagnosis eventually increases morbidity and mortality.