METHODS: A total of 138 patients aged between 18 and 65 years old with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II status, who required general anaesthesia and had no contraindication towards the use of P-LMA™, were recruited. They were randomly positioned into three anatomical landmarks, which were umbilicus, lowest rib margin, and xiphoid. P-LMA™ was inserted following muscle paralysis, and the first successful placement was evaluated using positional and performance tests. Duration, ease of P-LMA™ insertion, and airway complications were compared.

RESULTS: Demographic and airway features were comparable among all groups. The P-LMA™ placement success rate improved when the table height was positioned at the lowest rib margin (p=0.002). All three positions were comparable in terms of duration, ease of insertion, and airway morbidities.

Materials and methods: Eighty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups receiving either study drug infusion. Anxiety
score, level of sedation using the Bispectral Index and Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation, hemodynamic stability, and
overall patient’s feedback on anxiolysis were assessed.

Results: Both groups showed a significant drop in mean anxiety score at 10 and 30 min after starting surgery. Difference in median
anxiety scores showed a significant reduction in anxiety score at the end of the surgery in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the
propofol group. Dexmedetomidine and propofol showed a significant drop in mean arterial pressure in the first 30 min and first 10 min
respectively. Both drugs demonstrated a significant drop in heart rate in the first 20 min from baseline after starting the drug infusion.
Patients in the dexmedetomidine group (76.20%) expressed statistically excellent feedback on anxiolysis compared to patients in the
propofol group (45.20%).