Background: Clinical reasoning is the name given to
the cognitive processes by which doctors evaluate and
analyse information from patients. It is a skill developed
by experiential learning and is difficult to assess
objectively. The script concordance test, an assessment
tool introduced into the health sciences about 15 years
ago, is a way of assessing clinical reasoning ability in
an objective manner and allows comparisons of the
decisions made by medical students and experts in
situations of uncertainty.
Methods: Twenty-six final year medical students from
the International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur,
were tested on their decision making skills regarding a
young febrile patient. The students evaluated different
pieces of information in five different scenarios and
made decisions on a five-point Likert scale in the
standard format of the script concordance test. Their
decisions were compared to the decisions of a panel of
experienced clinicians in Internal Medicine.
Results: The script concordance test scores for the
different scenarios were calculated with higher scores
being indicative of greater concordance between the
reasoning of students and doctors. The students showed
poor concordance with doctors in evaluating clinical
information. Overall, only 20 percent of the choices
made by students were the same as the choices made by
the majority of doctors.
Conclusion: Medical students vary in their ability to
interpret the significance of clinical information. Using
the script concordance test, this preliminary study looked
at the ability of final year medical students to interpret
information about a patient with a febrile illness. The
results showed poor concordance between students and
doctors in the way they interpreted clinical information.
The script concordance test has the potential to be a
tool for teaching and assessing clinical reasoning.