Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Sukor N, Sunthornyothin S, Thang TV, Tarigan TJ, Mercado-Asis LB, Sum S, et al.
    PMID: 38261997 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae039
    OBJECTIVE: While guidelines have been formulated for the management of primary aldosteronism (PA), following these recommendations may be challenging in developing countries with limited healthcare access. Hence, we aimed to assess the availability and affordability of healthcare resources for managing PA in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region, which includes low-middle-income countries.

    DESIGN: We instituted a questionnaire-based survey to specialists managing PA, assessing the availability and affordability of investigations and treatment. Population and income status data were taken from the national census and registries.

    RESULTS: Nine ASEAN country members (48 respondents) participated. While screening with aldosterone-renin-ratio is performed in all countries, confirmatory testing is routinely performed in only six countries due to lack of facilities and local assays, and cost constraint. Assays are only locally available in four countries, and some centers have a test turnaround time exceeding three weeks. In seven countries (combined population of 442 million), adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is not routinely performed due to insufficient radiological facilities or trained personnel, and cost constraint. Most patients have access to adrenalectomy and medications. In six countries, the cost of AVS and adrenalectomy combined is >30% of its annual gross domestic product per capita. While most patients had access to spironolactone, it was not universally affordable.

    CONCLUSION: Large populations currently do not have access to the healthcare resources required for the optimal management of PA. Greater efforts are required to improve healthcare access and affordability. Future guideline revisions for PA may need to consider these limitations.

  2. Parameswaran R, de Jong MC, Kit JLW, Sek K, Nam TQ, Thang TV, et al.
    Endocrine, 2023 Jan;79(1):135-142.
    PMID: 36129592 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03193-7
    AIM: Although Graves' disease (GD) is common in endocrine practices worldwide, global differences in diagnosis and management remain. We sought to assess the current practices for GD in countries across Asia and the Pacific (APAC), and to compare these with previously published surveys from North America and Europe.

    METHODS: A web-based survey on GD management was conducted on practicing clinicians. Responses from 542 clinicians were received and subsequently analysed and compared to outcomes from similar surveys from other regions.

    RESULTS: A total of 542 respondents participated in the survey, 515 (95%) of whom completed all sections. Of these, 86% were medical specialists, 11% surgeons, and 3% nuclear medicine physicians. In addition to serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine assays, most respondents would request TSH-receptor autoantibody (TRAb) measurement (68%) during initial work-up. Thyroid ultrasound is requested by about half of respondents (53%), while the use of nuclear medicine scans is limited. The preferred first-line treatment is anti-thyroid drug (ATD) therapy (79%) with methimazole (MMI) or carbimazole (CBZ), followed by radioiodine (RAI; 19%) and surgery (2%). In case of surgery, one-third of respondents would opt for a subtotal rather than a total thyroidectomy. In case of mild Graves orbitopathy (GO), ATDs (67%) remains the preferred treatment, but a larger proportion of clinicians prefer surgery (20%). For a patient with intention to conceive, the preferred treatment pattern remained unchanged, although propylthiouracil (PTU) became the preferred ATD-agent during the first trimester. In comparison to European and American practices, marked differences were noted in the relatively infrequent usage of nuclear medicine scans and the overall higher use of a ATDs and β-blockers and adjunctive ATD-treatment during RAI in the APAC-group.

    CONCLUSION: Although regional differences regarding the diagnosis and management of GD are apparent in this first pan-Asia-Pacific survey, this study reveals the overall approach to the management of this disease in Asia-Pacific generally tends to fall between the trends appreciated in the American and European cohorts.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links