MyMedR

Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext A Southeast Asia Consensus on the Definition and Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression

Tor PC, Amir N, Fam J, Ho R, Ittasakul P, Maramis MM, et al.

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2022;18:2747-2757.
PMID: 36444218 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S380792

INTRODUCTION: Despite the abundance of literature on treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is no universally accepted definition of TRD and available treatment pathways for the management of TRD vary across the Southeast Asia (SEA) region, highlighting the need for a uniform definition and treatment principles to optimize the management TRD in SEA.
METHODS: Following a thematic literature review and pre-meeting survey, a SEA expert panel comprising 13 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with TRD convened and utilized the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop consensus-based recommendations on the appropriate definition of TRD and principles for its management.
RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that "pharmacotherapy-resistant depression" (PRD) is a more suitable term for TRD and defined it as "failure of two drug treatments of adequate doses, for 4-8 weeks duration with adequate adherence, during a major depressive episode". A stepwise treatment approach should be employed for the management of PRD - treatment strategies can include maximizing dose, switching to a different class, and augmenting or combining treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, are also appropriate options for patients with PRD.
CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations on the operational definition of PRD and treatment principles for its management can be adapted to local contexts in the SEA countries but should not replace clinical judgement. Individual circumstances and benefit-risk balance should be carefully considered while determining the most appropriate treatment option for patients with PRD.
Adjunctive mood stabilizer treatment for hospitalized schizophrenia patients: Asia psychotropic prescription study (2001-2008)

Sim K, Yong KH, Chan YH, Tor PC, Xiang YT, Wang CY, et al.

Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol., 2011 Oct;14(9):1157-64.
PMID: 21557883 DOI: 10.1017/S1461145711000563

Recent studies indicate relatively high international rates of adjunctive psychotropic medication, including mood stabilizers, for patients with schizophrenia. Since such treatments are little studied in Asia, we examined the frequency of mood-stabilizer use and its clinical correlates among hospitalized Asian patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2001-2008. We evaluated usage rates of mood stabilizers with antipsychotic drugs, and associated factors, for in-patients diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia in 2001, 2004 and 2008 in nine Asian regions: China, Hong Kong, India, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Singapore. Overall, mood stabilizers were given to 20.4% (n=1377/6761) of hospitalized schizophrenia patients, with increased usage over time. Mood-stabilizer use was significantly and independently associated in multivariate logistic modeling with: aggressive behaviour, disorganized speech, year sampled (2008 vs. earlier), multiple hospitalizations, less negative symptoms, younger age, with regional variation (Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore>Taiwan or China). Co-prescription of adjunctive mood stabilizers with antipsychotics for hospitalized Asian schizophrenia patients increased over the past decade, and was associated with specific clinical characteristics. This practice parallels findings in other countries and illustrates ongoing tension between evidence-based practice vs. individualized, empirical treatment of psychotic disorders.

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links