Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Xu W, Yau YK, Pan Y, Tse ETY, Lam CLK, Wan EYF
    Lancet Healthy Longev, 2025 Mar 04.
    PMID: 40058388 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100683
    BACKGROUND: There remains a scarcity of evidence on initiating statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among older adults with chronic kidney disease due to the under-representation of this population in randomised controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in older adults (aged 75-84 years) and very old adults (aged ≥85 years) with chronic kidney disease.

    METHODS: Using territory-wide public electronic health records in Hong Kong, patients older than 60 years with chronic kidney disease and with hyperlipidaemia (defined as elevated LDL cholesterol of ≥2·6 mmol/L) were identified for inclusion in the analyses and were included on a rolling basis in each calendar month from January, 2008, to December, 2015. Patients were categorised into different age groups (ie, 60-74 years, 75-84 years, and ≥85 years) for analysis, and the 60-74 years age group was used as a benchmark group to test the validity of our emulated trial since the effect of statin therapy is well established in this age group. The framework of target trial emulation was adopted to investigate the association between statin therapy and the risk of overall cardiovascular disease incidence, specific cardiovascular disease subtypes (ie, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke), and all-cause mortality, as well as major adverse events (ie, myopathies and liver dysfunction). The primary outcome was overall cardiovascular disease incidence. The hazard ratios for the outcomes were estimated by pooled logistic models in the intention-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis.

    FINDINGS: 711 966 person-trials from 96 trials were eligible for inclusion in the study. 19 423 unique individuals with chronic kidney disease aged 60-74 years, 22 565 unique individuals with chronic kidney disease aged 75-84 years, and 8811 unique individuals with chronic kidney disease aged 85 years and older were identified for inclusion in the analyses. In patients aged 75-84 years, a significant risk reduction was observed for overall cardiovascular disease incidence in both the intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94 [95% CI 0·89-0·99]) and in the per-protocol analysis (0·86 [0·80-0·92]) and for all-cause mortality (0·87 [0·82-0·91] in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0·78 [0·72-0·84] in the per-protocol analysis). This risk reduction was also observed among patients aged 85 years and older for cardiovascular diseases (HR 0·88 [0·79-0·99] in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0·81 [0·71-0·92] in the per-protocol analysis), and for all-cause mortality (0·89 [0·81-0·98] in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0·80 [0·71-0·91] in the per-protocol analysis). Substantial risk reduction for myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke were also observed across all age groups. No significantly increased risk of myopathies or liver dysfunction was observed in any of the age groups.

    INTERPRETATION: Statin therapy is beneficial for hypercholesterolemic older patients with chronic kidney disease aged 75 years and older regarding the primary prevention against cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality, without posing an increased risk of major adverse events. The benefits and safety persist in those aged 85 years and older.

    FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China Excellent Young Scientists Fund (Hong Kong and Macau).

  2. Lee EK, Wang S, Ng WL, Ramdzan SN, Tse E, Chan L, et al.
    J Hypertens, 2024 Oct 01;42(10):1653-1664.
    PMID: 39196688 DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003783
    Since the effects of once-daily antihypertensive (HT) medications are more pronounced within the first few hours of ingestion, evening administration of anti-HT medications can be a feasible treatment for nocturnal HT. However, no relevant meta-analysis has been conducted in patients with nocturnal HT. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials involving patients with elevated mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and compared evening anti-HT administration with morning administration. Multiple databases, including grey literature (e.g. clincialtrial.gov), were searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two independent authors. Risk of bias assessment and overall quality of evidence were conducted using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and GRADE by two independent authors. A total of 107 studies were included, 76 of which were investigated in China and had not been identified in previous reviews. Only one trial was ranked low risk-of-bias. Evening administration of anti-HT medications was effective in reducing nocturnal systolic BP (4.12-9.10 mmHg; I2 = 80.5-95.2%) and diastolic BP (3.38-5.87 mmHg; I2 = 87.4-95.6%). Subgroup analyses found that the effectiveness of evening administration was contributed by data from the Hermida group and China. Evening administration did not provide additional nocturnal/daytime/24-h BP reduction in non-Hermida/non-China studies (I2 = 0) and in meta-analyses that included studies with unclear or low risk of bias. The effectiveness of nocturnal BP reduction was similar across different types, doses, and half-lives of medications. Evening administration of anti-HT medications may reduce proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), nondipping and morning surge. The overall quality of evidence was ranked as very low to low. Our results highlight the scarcity of low risk-of-bias studies and emphasize the need for such trials to evaluate the efficacy of evening dosing of anti-HT medications as a standard treatment for patients with nocturnal HT across diverse populations.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links