All life on Earth is composed of cells, which are built from and run by biological reactions and structures. These reactions and structures are generally the result of action by cellular biomolecules, which are indispensable for the function and survival of all living organisms. Specifically, biological catalysis, namely by protein enzymes, but also by other biomolecules including nucleic acids, is an essential component of life. How the biomolecules themselves that perform biological catalysis came to exist in the first place is a major unanswered question that plagues researchers to this day, which is generally the focus of the origins of life (OoL) research field. Based on current knowledge, it is generally postulated that early Earth was full of a myriad of different chemicals, and that these chemicals reacted in specific ways that led to the emergence of biochemistry, cells, and later, life. In particular, a significant part of OoL research focuses on the synthesis, evolution, and function of biomolecules potentially present under early Earth conditions, as a way to understand their eventual transition into modern life. However, this narrative overlooks possibilities that other molecules contributed to the OoL, as while biomolecules that led to life were certainly present on early Earth, at the same time, other molecules that may not have strict, direct biological lineage were also widely and abundantly present. For example, hydroxy acids, although playing a role in metabolism or as parts of certain biological structures, are not generally considered to be as essential to modern biology as amino acids (a chemically similar monomer), and thus research in the OoL field tends to perhaps focus more on amino acids than hydroxy acids. However, their likely abundance on early Earth coupled with their ability to spontaneously condense into polymers (i.e., polyesters) make hydroxy acids, and their subsequent products, functions, and reactions, a reasonable target of investigation for prebiotic chemists. Whether "non-biological" hydroxy acids or polyesters can contribute to the emergence of life on early Earth is an inquiry that deserves attention within the OoL community, as this knowledge can also contribute to our understanding of the plausibility of extraterrestrial life that does not exactly use the biochemical set found in terrestrial organisms. While some demonstrations have been made with respect to compartment assembly, compartmentalization, and growth of primitive polyester-based systems, whether these "non-biological" polymers can contribute any catalytic function and/or drive primitive reactions is still an important step toward the development of early life. Here, we review research both from the OoL field as well as from industry and applied sciences regarding potential catalysis or reaction driven by "non-biological" polyesters in various forms: as linear polymers, as hyperbranched polyesters, and as membraneless microdroplets.
α-hydroxy acids (αHAs), simple and prebiotically plausible organic monomers, were likely present in various environments on and off Earth and could have played a role in directing the emergence of the first homochiral living systems. Some αHAs, which could have been of varying chirality, can undergo dehydration polymerization into polyesters, which could assemble into membraneless microdroplets upon rehydration; understanding these processes is critical for unraveling how simple prebiotic molecules transitioned into more complex systems capable of supporting selective chemical reactions, a key step toward the origin of life. Here, we focused on tartaric acid (TA), a prebiotically relevant αHA with multiple chiral forms, to probe plausible mechanisms by which primitive αHA and polyester-based systems could have participated in selective homochiral polymer synthesis. Enantiopure solutions of d-TA or l-TA polymerize efficiently via dehydration, while racemic dl-TA polymerization is inhibited due to stereochemical incompatibility. We found that Ca2+ ions influence this process in two significant ways: 1) regulating TA monomer availability through selective crystallization, removing equal amounts of both enantiomers in racemic proportion and thereby enriching the enantiomeric excess of the remaining nonracemic TA solution; and 2) modulating polymerization by suppressing enantiopure TA polymerization while enabling dl-TA polymerization. These findings suggest that the differential availability of simple inorganic ions, such as Ca2+, could have indirectly mediated the selection of simple organic chiral monomers and the emergence of homochirality in primitive protocell-forming polymers, offering a pathway from nonliving to living matter in early Earth environments.
In this review, we describe some of the central philosophical issues facing origins-of-life research and provide a targeted history of the developments that have led to the multidisciplinary field of origins-of-life studies. We outline these issues and developments to guide researchers and students from all fields. With respect to philosophy, we provide brief summaries of debates with respect to (1) definitions (or theories) of life, what life is and how research should be conducted in the absence of an accepted theory of life, (2) the distinctions between synthetic, historical, and universal projects in origins-of-life studies, issues with strategies for inferring the origins of life, such as (3) the nature of the first living entities (the "bottom up" approach) and (4) how to infer the nature of the last universal common ancestor (the "top down" approach), and (5) the status of origins of life as a science. Each of these debates influences the others. Although there are clusters of researchers that agree on some answers to these issues, each of these debates is still open. With respect to history, we outline several independent paths that have led to some of the approaches now prevalent in origins-of-life studies. These include one path from early views of life through the scientific revolutions brought about by Linnaeus (von Linn.), Wöhler, Miller, and others. In this approach, new theories, tools, and evidence guide new thoughts about the nature of life and its origin. We also describe another family of paths motivated by a" circularity" approach to life, which is guided by such thinkers as Maturana & Varela, Gánti, Rosen, and others. These views echo ideas developed by Kant and Aristotle, though they do so using modern science in ways that produce exciting avenues of investigation. By exploring the history of these ideas, we can see how many of the issues that currently interest us have been guided by the contexts in which the ideas were developed. The disciplinary backgrounds of each of these scholars has influenced the questions they sought to answer, the experiments they envisioned, and the kinds of data they collected. We conclude by encouraging scientists and scholars in the humanities and social sciences to explore ways in which they can interact to provide a deeper understanding of the conceptual assumptions, structure, and history of origins-of-life research. This may be useful to help frame future research agendas and bring awareness to the multifaceted issues facing this challenging scientific question.