For several decades, primatologists have been interested in understanding how sympatric primate species are able to coexist. Most of our understanding of primate community ecology derives from the assumption that these animals interact predominantly with other primates. In this study, we investigate to what extent multiple community assembly hypotheses consistent with this assumption are supported when tested with communities of primates in isolation versus with communities of primates, birds, bats, and squirrels together. We focus on vertebrate communities on the island of Borneo, where we examine the determinants of presence or absence of species, and how these communities are structured. We test for checkerboard distributions, guild proportionality, and Fox's assembly rule for favored states, and predict that statistical signals reflecting interactions between ecologically similar species will be stronger when nonprimate taxa are included in analyses. We found strong support for checkerboard distributions in several communities, particularly when taxonomic groups were combined, and after controlling for habitat effects. We found evidence of guild proportionality in some communities, but did not find significant support for Fox's assembly rule in any of the communities examined. These results demonstrate the presence of vertebrate community structure that is ecologically determined rather than randomly generated, which is a finding consistent with the interpretation that interactions within and between these taxonomic groups may have shaped species composition in these communities. This research highlights the importance of considering the broader vertebrate communities with which primates co-occur, and so we urge primatologists to explicitly consider nonprimate taxa in the study of primate ecology.
Debate on the adaptive origins of primates has long focused on the functional ecology of the primate visual system. For example, it is hypothesized that variable expression of short- (SWS1) and middle-to-long-wavelength sensitive (M/LWS) opsins, which confer color vision, can be used to infer ancestral activity patterns and therefore selective ecological pressures. A problem with this approach is that opsin gene variation is incompletely known in the grandorder Euarchonta, that is, the orders Scandentia (treeshrews), Dermoptera (colugos), and Primates. The ancestral state of primate color vision is therefore uncertain. Here, we report on the genes (OPN1SW and OPN1LW) that encode SWS1 and M/LWS opsins in seven species of treeshrew, including the sole nocturnal scandentian Ptilocercus lowii. In addition, we examined the opsin genes of the Central American woolly opossum (Caluromys derbianus), an enduring ecological analogue in the debate on primate origins. Our results indicate: 1) retention of ultraviolet (UV) visual sensitivity in C. derbianus and a shift from UV to blue spectral sensitivities at the base of Euarchonta; 2) ancient pseudogenization of OPN1SW in the ancestors of P. lowii, but a signature of purifying selection in those of C. derbianus; and, 3) the absence of OPN1LW polymorphism among diurnal treeshrews. These findings suggest functional variation in the color vision of nocturnal mammals and a distinctive visual ecology of early primates, perhaps one that demanded greater spatial resolution under light levels that could support cone-mediated color discrimination.
The digestive tract of animals, and the patterns how passage markers are excreted from them, have been fruitfully compared to chemical reactor models from engineering science. An important characteristic of idealized reactor models is the smoothness of the curves plotting marker concentrations in outflow (i.e., faeces) over time, which is the result of the assumed complete mixing of the marker with the reactor contents. Published excretion patterns from passage experiments in non-primate mammals appear to indicate a high degree of digesta mixing. In order to assess whether marker excretion graphs from primates differ from ideal outflow graphs, we performed passage experiments in eight individuals of three foregut-fermenting species (Pygathrix nemaeus, Trachypithecus auratus and Semnopithecus vetulus), and added them to available marker excretion curves from the literature. In the resulting collection, 23 out of a total of 25 patterns in foregut fermenters (21 individuals of 10 species from 7 studies), and 13 out of 15 in hindgut fermenters (9 individuals of 2 species from 2 studies), showed an irregular, 'spiky' pattern. We consider this proportion to be too high to be explained by experimental errors, and suggest that this may indicate a taxon-wide characteristic of particularly incomplete digesta mixing, acknowledging that further data from less related primate species are required for corroboration. Our hypothesis is in accordance with previous findings of a comparatively low degree of 'digesta washing' (differential retention of particulate and fluid digesta) in primates. Together with literature findings that suggest a low chewing efficiency in primates compared to other mammals, these observations indicate that in contrast to other herbivores, the success of the primate order is not derived from particularly elaborate adaptations of their ingestive and digestive physiology.