Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Fulltext Evaluation of image quality of bitewing radiographs taken by UITM dental students.
    Ayoub,A,A,, A,Rasid,L,H,, Razak,S,, Kamaruzaman,M,, Azmi,N,W,
    Compendium of Oral Science, 2020;7(1):32-40.
    MyJurnal
    Abstract
    Objectives: To evaluate the quality of bitewing radiograph taken by Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) dental
    students during daily clinical practices and to evaluate the difference in caries lesions found on bitewing
    radiographs and clinical examination.
    Materials and method: 120 patients who attended the undergraduate dental clinic for dental examination were
    included in this study. The inclusion criteria were patients within the age range of 17-45 years old, possessing
    at least three sets of posterior teeth, with bitewing radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students. The
    number of caries lesions detected by clinical examination, bitewing radiographs, and a combination of both
    methods were recorded. The quality of 240 bitewing radiographs was classified into three categories; excellent,
    acceptable, and unacceptable. The frequency of radiographic errors; foreshortening/elongation, horizontal
    overlapping, inadequate film coverage, non-ideal centering and inadequate contrast and density were also
    evaluated.
    Results: The quality of bitewing radiographs are mostly accepted to be used as a diagnostic tool and one of the
    factors which commonly affected the quality of the bitewing is the overlapping of adjacent teeth. The highest
    number of caries lesions were detected radiographically (74%) compared with 25% caries by clinical
    examination. The majority of radiographs (71%, n=171) were deemed to be of acceptable quality, 39(16%) were
    excellent, and 30(13%) were diagnostically unacceptable. “Horizontal overlap” was the most common error
    detected on the radiographs (n=139, 57.9%), followed by “non-ideal centering” (n=93, 38.8%), “inadequate
    contrast” (n=46, 19.2%) and “inadequate film coverage” (n=24,10%). The highest number of caries lesions were
    detected radiographically (74%) compared with 25% caries by clinical examination.
    Conclusion: The quality of the majority of bitewing radiographs taken by undergraduate dental students in this
    institution is acceptable. However, given that more than half of the radiographs possessed horizontal
    overlapping error, caries diagnosis may have been underestimated. Further training and periodic audits are
    required to reduce the percentage of errors in bitewing radiographs amongst undergraduate dental students.
    Matched MeSH terms: Radiography, Bitewing
  2. The correlation between crestal bone resorption and implant stability during healing period using resonance frequency analysis
    Al-Juboori MJ, AbdulRahaman SB, Hassan A
    Implant Dent, 2013 Aug;22(4):351-5.
    PMID: 23811720 DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318296583d
    To detect the correlation between crestal bone resorption and implant stability during healing period using resonance frequency analysis (RFA).
    Matched MeSH terms: Radiography, Bitewing/methods
  3. Proximal caries lesion detection using the Canary Caries Detection System: an in vitro study
    Jan J, Wan Bakar WZ, Mathews SM, Okoye LO, Ehler BR, Louden C, et al.
    J Investig Clin Dent, 2016 Nov;7(4):383-390.
    PMID: 26012784 DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12163
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the accuracy of the Canary System (CS) to detect proximal caries lesions in vitro, and compared it with conventional methods: International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and bitewing radiography (BW).

    METHODS: Visible proximal surfaces of extracted human teeth were assessed by ICDAS-II before setting them in five manikin mouth models. Then contacting proximal surfaces in mouth models were assessed by BW and CS. Histological validation with polarized-light microscopy served as a gold standard. Pairwise comparisons were performed on area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the three methods, and corrected using Bonferroni's method. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using a test of proportions and AUC values were compared using DeLong's method.

    RESULTS: The CS presented significantly higher sensitivity (0.933) than ICDAS-II (0.733, P = 0.01) and BW (0.267, P 

    Matched MeSH terms: Radiography, Bitewing/methods
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links