Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. The effect of educational intervention on nurses' knowledge, attitude, intention, practice and incidence rate of physical restraint use
    Eskandari F, Abdullah KL, Zainal NZ, Wong LP
    Nurse Educ Pract, 2018 Sep;32:52-57.
    PMID: 30029085 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.007
    The use of physical restraint exposes patients and staff to negative effects, including death. Therefore, teaching nursing staff to develop the improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding physical restraint has become necessary. A quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to evaluate the effect of educational intervention on nurses' knowledge, attitude, intention, practice and incidence rate of physical restraint in 12 wards of a hospital using a self-reported questionnaire and a restraint order form in Malaysia. The educational intervention, which included a one-day session on minimising physical restraint use in hospital, was presented to 245 nurses. The results showed a significant increase in the mean knowledge, attitude sand practice score and a significant decrease in the mean intention score of nurses to use physical restraint after intervention. There was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence rate of physical restraint use in the wards of the hospital except geriatric-rehabilitation wards after intervention.
    Matched MeSH terms: Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data*
  2. Incidence Rate and Patterns of Physical Restraint Use Among Adult Patients in Malaysia
    Eskandari F, Abdullah KL, Zainal NZ, Wong LP
    Clin Nurs Res, 2018 03;27(3):278-295.
    PMID: 27856788 DOI: 10.1177/1054773816677807
    Incidence rate and patterns of physical restraint use were examined based on a cross-sectional study in 22 wards of a large teaching hospital in Malaysia. Results indicated that the highest rate of physical restraint (19.7%) was reported from neurology-neurosurgery wards. "Un-cooperative for electroconvulsive therapy" and "trying to pull out catheters" were the most commonly reported reasons to use restraint in psychiatric and non-psychiatric wards, respectively. There were some relationships between patterns of physical restraint in this study. Exploring the incidence rate and patterns of physical restraint is important so that effective strategies can be formulated to minimize using restraint in hospitals.
    Matched MeSH terms: Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data*
  3. The effect of melatonin on delirium in hospitalised patients: A systematic review and meta-analyses with trial sequential analysis
    Ng KT, Teoh WY, Khor AJ
    J Clin Anesth, 2020 Feb;59:74-81.
    PMID: 31279283 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.027
    OBJECTIVES: Melatonin is an endogenous hormone, which regulates circadian rhythms and promotes sleep. In recent years, several randomised controlled trials examining the prophylactic use of melatonin to prevent delirium were published with conflicting findings. The primary aim of this review was to determine the effect of melatonin on the incidence of delirium in hospitalised patients.

    DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from their inception until December 2018.

    REVIEW METHODS: All randomised clinical trials were included.

    RESULTS: Sixteen trials (1634 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Incidence of delirium was not significantly lower in patients who received melatonin, with an odd ratio, OR (95%Cl) of 0.55 (0.24-1.26); ρ = 0.16, certainty of evidence = low, trial sequential analysis = inconclusive. However, patients who randomised to melatonin had a significantly shorter length of stay in intensive care units, with a mean difference, MD (95%CI) of -1.84 days (-2.46, -1.21); ρ restraints (OR 95%Cl 0.65; 0.31-1.37; ρ = 0.26) and the requirement of sedative agents (OR 95%Cl 0.86; 0.48-1.55; ρ = 0.62).

    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results of this meta-analysis of sixteen trials neither support nor oppose the use of melatonin in the prevention of delirium of hospitalised patients. We identified high heterogeneity across all the included trials and low certainty of evidence with potential type II error. Future multi-centre, adequately powered randomised controlled trials are warranted to provide more certainty on the use of melatonin for the prevention of delirium.

    PROSPERO: CRD42019123546.

    Matched MeSH terms: Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links