Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Fahmy O, Khairul-Asri MG, Schwentner C, Schubert T, Stenzl A, Zahran MH, et al.
    Eur Urol, 2016 08;70(2):293-8.
    PMID: 26776935 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.047
    CONTEXT: Although urethral covering during hypospadias repair minimizes the incidence of fistula, wide variation in results among surgeons has been reported.

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate what type of flap used during Snodgrass or fistula repair reduces the incidence of fistula occurrence.

    EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically reviewed published results for urethral covering during Snodgrass and fistula repair procedures. An initial online search detected 1740 reports. After exclusion of ineligible studies at two stages, we included all patients with clear data on the covering technique used (dartos fascia [DF] vs tunica vaginalis flap [TVF]) and the incidence of postoperative fistula.

    EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 51 reports were identified involving 4550 patients, including 33 series on DF use, 11 series on TVF use, and seven retrospective comparative studies. For distal hypospadias, double-layer DF had the lowest rate of fistula incidence when compared to single-layer DF (5/855 [0.6%] vs 156/3077 [5.1%]; p=0.004) and TVF (5/244, 2.0%), while the incidence was highest for single-layer DF among proximal hypospadias cases (9/102, 8.8%). Among repeat cases, fistula incidence was significantly lower for TVF (3/47, 6.4%) than for DF (26/140, 18.6%; p=0.020). Among patients with fistula after primary repair, the incidence of recurrence was 12.2% (11/90) after DF and 5.1% (5/97) after TVF (p=0.39). The absence of a minimum follow-up time and the lack of information regarding skin complications and rates of urethral stricture are limitations of this study.

    CONCLUSION: A double DF during tubularized incised plate urethroplasty should be considered for all patients with distal hypospadias. In proximal, repeat, and fistula repair cases, TVF should be the first choice. On the basis of these findings, we propose an evidence-based algorithm for surgeons who are still in their learning phase or want to improve their results.

    PATIENT SUMMARY: We systematically reviewed the impact of urethral covering in reducing fistula formation after hypospadias repair. We propose an algorithm that might help to maximize success rates for tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

    Matched MeSH terms: Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
  2. Lo TS, Pue LB, Tan YL, Long CY, Lin YH, Wu PY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2016 Aug;55(4):519-24.
    PMID: 27590375 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.12.019
    OBJECTIVE: Voiding dysfunction following a midurethral sling procedure is still a relevant consequence that can affect patients' quality of life. Various invasive methods have been described to manage this problem. We hypothesize that we if we could diagnose the condition early using noninvasive tools, we would be able to offer appropriate effective management. We sought to study the effectiveness of attaching a tension-releasing suture on a single-incision sling (SIS) tape as a prophylactic measure for the treatment of immediate postoperative voiding dysfunctions, and secondarily, to evaluate the objective and subjective cure rates of the treatment for stress urinary incontinence.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a prospective observational study. A tension-releasing suture was prepared by appending a polyglactin suture to one end of the MiniArc sling tip fiber, which could be used to manipulate the sling tip when postoperative voiding dysfunction was identified. Primary outcome measure was the number of patients requiring tension-releasing suture manipulation to treat postoperative voiding dysfunctions successfully.

    RESULTS: Twelve of the 131 (9.2%) patients who underwent SIS procedure for urodynamic stress incontinence surgery required tension-releasing suture manipulation due to voiding dysfunction during the immediate postoperative period with a good outcome. Postoperative overall objective and subjective cure rates were 90.5% and 88.9% (126 available patients at 1-year follow up, mean 19.2 ± 8.0 months), respectively. The subanalysis of the objective and subjective cure rates of the group with tension-releasing suture manipulation were 91.7% (11/12) and 91.7% (11/12), and those of the group without tension-releasing suture manipulation were 90.4% (103/114) and 88.6% (101/114), respectively, at 1-year follow up.

    CONCLUSION: Tension-releasing suture is effective in the management of immediate postoperative voiding dysfunction in an SIS procedure. SIS operation has good short-term objective and subjective cure rates for female urodynamic stress incontinence.

    Matched MeSH terms: Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
  3. Lo TS, Jaili SB, Ibrahim R
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2017 Aug;56(4):534-537.
    PMID: 28805613 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.10.004
    OBJECTIVE: Urethral diverticulum is uncommon, therefore appropriate evaluation, preoperative planning and counseling must be done in order to make correct diagnosis and prevent complications.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case of anterior vaginal wall mass was treated elsewhere by a gynecologist as periurethral cyst abscess; incision and drainage were done but a symptom of pus discharge was observed after 2 weeks. Therefore, exploration, cyst wall excision and primary closure were done though histopathological examination surprisingly confirmed the presence of urethral tissue suggestive of diverticulum.

    RESULTS: Subsequently, she developed persistent urinary leakage along with urethrovaginal fistula for which they again performed pervaginal multilayer closure. Patient was later referred to us with recurrent urethrovaginal fistula. We performed posterior urethral fistulectomy with anterior vaginal wall flap and multilayer closure. Three years follow up reveals complete recovery.

    CONCLUSION: Even urethral diverticulum is a rare condition, should be kept in mind as early diagnosis and management.

    Matched MeSH terms: Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links