Affiliations 

  • 1 Computer Vision Laboratory, School of Computer Science (Y.E.K., A.P.F.), Department of Radiological Sciences, Mental Health & Clinical Neuroscience (S.P., R.A.D.), Stroke Trials Unit, Mental Health & Clinical Neuroscience (Z.K.L., K.K., P.M.B., N.S.), and Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre (R.A.D.), University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, 7301 Wollaton Rd, Lenton, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, England (S.P., R.A.D.); Department of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Z.K.L.); School of Medical Imaging, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia (A.A.); and Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, England (K.K., P.M.B., N.S.)
Radiol Artif Intell, 2022 Nov;4(6):e220096.
PMID: 36523645 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220096

Abstract

This study evaluated deep learning algorithms for semantic segmentation and quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), perihematomal edema (PHE), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on noncontrast CT scans of patients with spontaneous ICH. Models were assessed on 1732 annotated baseline noncontrast CT scans obtained from the Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ie, TICH-2) international multicenter trial (ISRCTN93732214), and different loss functions using a three-dimensional no-new-U-Net (nnU-Net) were examined to address class imbalance (30% of participants with IVH in dataset). On the test cohort (n = 174, 10% of dataset), the top-performing models achieved median Dice similarity coefficients of 0.92 (IQR, 0.89-0.94), 0.66 (0.58-0.71), and 1.00 (0.87-1.00), respectively, for ICH, PHE, and IVH segmentation. U-Net-based networks showed comparable, satisfactory performances on ICH and PHE segmentations (P > .05), but all nnU-Net variants achieved higher accuracy than the Brain Lesion Analysis and Segmentation Tool for CT (BLAST-CT) and DeepLabv3+ for all labels (P < .05). The Focal model showed improved performance in IVH segmentation compared with the Tversky, two-dimensional nnU-Net, U-Net, BLAST-CT, and DeepLabv3+ models (P < .05). Focal achieved concordance values of 0.98, 0.88, and 0.99 for ICH, PHE, and ICH volumes, respectively. The mean volumetric differences between the ground truth and prediction were 0.32 mL (95% CI: -8.35, 9.00), 1.14 mL (-9.53, 11.8), and 0.06 mL (-1.71, 1.84), respectively. In conclusion, U-Net-based networks provide accurate segmentation on CT images of spontaneous ICH, and Focal loss can address class imbalance. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) no. ISRCTN93732214 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022 Keywords: Head/Neck, Brain/Brain Stem, Hemorrhage, Segmentation, Quantification, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.