Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • 2 Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Gastroenterology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Joondalup Health Campus and SJOG Midland, Curtin Medical School, Murdoch, Australia
  • 3 Department of Pediatrics, Makati Medical Center, Makati City, Manila, Philippines
  • 4 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 5 Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • 6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 7 Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
  • 8 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 9 Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong
  • 10 Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • 11 Department of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
  • 12 Division of Gastroenterology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
  • 13 Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr, 2024 Jul;27(4):258-265.
PMID: 39035405 DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2024.27.4.258

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date, there is no region-specific guideline for pediatric endoscopy training. This study aimed to illustrate the current status of pediatric endoscopy training in Asia-Pacific region and identify opportunities for improvement.

METHODS: A cross-sectional survey, using a standardized electronic questionnaire, was conducted among medical schools in the Asia-Pacific region in January 2024.

RESULTS: A total of 57 medical centers in 12 countries offering formal Pediatric Gastroenterology training programs participated in this regional survey. More than 75% of the centers had an average case load of <10 cases per week for both diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies. Only 36% of the study programs employed competency-based outcomes for program development, whereas nearly half (48%) used volume-based curricula. Foreign body retrieval, polypectomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and esophageal variceal hemostasis, that is, sclerotherapy or band ligation (endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation), comprised the top four priorities that the trainees should acquire in the autonomous stage (unconscious) of competence. Regarding the learning environment, only 31.5% provided formal hands-on workshops/simulation training. The direct observation of procedural skills was the most commonly used assessment method. The application of a quality assurance (QA) system in both educational and patient care (Pediatric Endoscopy Quality Improvement Network) aspects was present in only 28% and 17% of the centers, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Compared with Western academic societies, the limited availability of cases remains a major concern. To close this gap, simulation and adult endoscopy training are essential. The implementation of reliable and valid assessment tools and QA systems can lead to significant development in future programs.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.