Fulltext

Impact of pharmacist-led medication review among hemodialysis patients: a systematic review

Paneerselvam GS 1 , Kah Yee C 1 , Farrukh MJ 2 , Yuda A 3 , Hermansyah A 3 , Mohd Asmani MF 4 Show all authors , Abdullah I 4 , Ming LC 3

Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Pharmacy, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
  • 2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 4 School of Pharmacy, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Malaysia
J Pharm Policy Pract, 2025;18(1):2446912.
PMID: 39911588 DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2446912

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication-related problems (DRPs) are common among hemodialysis (HD) patients, and pharmacist-led medication reviews have been shown to address such issues. However, the impact of these interventions and the specific types of DRPs among this patient group remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews among HD patients, identify the most prevalent types of DRPs, and explore the factors associated with these problems.

METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across databases such as Medline via PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and EBSCOHost, for studies published from January 2012 to July 2023. Studies included were those focusing on pharmacist interventions in HD patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies.

RESULTS: After screening 343 articles, 10 studies (involving 1342 HD patients) were included. Nine studies were rated as high quality, and one as fair quality. The studies predominantly used prospective designs. A total of 4511 DRPs were identified, with suboptimal drug treatment, non-adherence to medications, and drug use without indication being the most common issues. Pharmacist interventions led to the resolution or reduction of DRPs, shorter hospital stays, improvement in laboratory outcomes, better quality of life (QoL), and enhanced patient understanding. However, interventions had minimal or no significant impact on reducing unplanned admissions, mortality rates, or improving medication adherence. The reduction in healthcare utilisation costs was inconsistent across studies.

CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led medication reviews were effective in resolving DRPs and improving clinical outcomes in HD patients, such as quality of life and lab values. However, their impact on healthcare utilisation and mortality remains inconclusive. Further research with longer follow-up is needed to assess the long-term economic outcomes of these interventions.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications