Affiliations 

  • 1 Dental Officer, Trong Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health, Perak, Malaysia; Trainee Lecturer, Centre of Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Malaysia
  • 2 Dental Officer, Bagan Serai Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health, Perak, Malaysia
  • 3 Dental Officer, Marang Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • 4 Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: behyewhin@ukm.edu.my
J Prosthet Dent, 2025 Feb 07.
PMID: 39922746 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.019

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Attempting to combine the mechanical and optical properties of ceramics and composite resins to mimic natural teeth has led to the emergence of resin nanoceramics and polymer interpenetrating ceramic network materials. Systematic reviews on the survival of these materials in endodontically treated teeth are lacking.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the survival of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) resin nanoceramics and polymer interpenetrating ceramic network material restorations on endodontically treated teeth and to describe the incidence of complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database and adhered to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search across 6 online databases was performed. Clinical studies which involved CAD-CAM manufactured resin nanoceramics and polymer interpenetrating ceramic network material restorations on endodontically treated teeth were included. Several investigators independently conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment processes. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Failure rates were analyzed using Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 3- and 5-year survival proportions, which were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed for material type and restoration design (α=.05).

RESULTS: The search resulted in 250 studies after duplicate removal, and 11 articles were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis of 289 restorations revealed an overall estimated failure rate of 3.44 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.67-4.21) per 100 restoration years, equivalent to a survival rate of 90.2% (95% CI: 88.1-92.3%) after 3 years and 84.2% (95% CI: 81.0-87.5%) after 5 years. A significantly lower (P

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.