Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  • 2 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: diprima.ambralicia@hsr.it
  • 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
  • 4 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
  • 5 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Intensive Care Department, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia
  • 6 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; V. Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
  • 7 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk, Russia; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
  • 8 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Cardiopneumology, Instituto do Coracao, University of São Paulo, Hospital SirioLibanes, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 9 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
  • 10 Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 11 Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, King Abdullah Medical City-Holy Capital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
  • 12 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiovascular Institute Dedinje, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 13 Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 14 Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi
  • 15 Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, and the Clinical Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb
  • 16 Anesthesiology Department, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • 17 Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesia Department, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Center, Riffa, Bahrain
  • 18 Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa
  • 19 Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2020 Jun;34(6):1622-1635.
PMID: 32276758 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.038

Abstract

SEPARATION from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after cardiac surgery is a progressive transition from full mechanical circulatory and respiratory support to spontaneous mechanical activity of the lungs and heart. During the separation phase, measurements of cardiac performance with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provide the rationale behind the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process. In many cases, it is possible to predict a complex separation from CPB, such as when there is known preoperative left or right ventricular dysfunction, bleeding, hypovolemia, vasoplegia, pulmonary hypertension, or owing to technical complications related to the surgery. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic decisions regarding mechanical or pharmacologic support have to be made within a few minutes. In fact, a complex separation from CPB if not adequately treated leads to a poor outcome in the vast majority of cases. Unfortunately, no specific criteria defining complex separation from CPB and no management guidelines for these patients currently exist. Taking into account the above considerations, the aim of the present review is to describe the most common scenarios associated with a complex CPB separation and to suggest strategies, pharmacologic agents, and para-corporeal mechanical devices that can be adopted to manage patients with complex separation from CPB. The routine management strategies of complex CPB separation of 17 large cardiac centers from 14 countries in 5 continents will also be described.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.