Affiliations 

  • 1 Advanced Reproductive Centre (ARC), Hospital Canselor Tuanku Mukhriz (HCTM) UKM, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Obstetrics & Gynaecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur Campus, National University of Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig, 2021 Jul 29;42(4):389-393.
PMID: 34323055 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2021-0002

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The role of air bubbles in bracketing the embryo-containing medium in inner catheter during embryo transfer (ET) has already been established. However, the role of air bubbles in outer catheter (OC) during implantation is yet to be determined. This study aimed to compare the implantation rates between women who have undergone ET with or without ASP (Vitrolife®; Sweden), a medium use for oocyte retrieval and rinsing in OC embryo catheter. The purpose of introducing the ASP medium to the OC was to eliminate air bubbles in that space during implantation.

METHODS: A total of 312 women were randomly divided into two groups with 156 participants each group. In Group A, ASP medium was used during ET, whereas in Group B, no ASP medium was utilized. Positive implantation was defined as serum beta-hCG level >5 mIU/mL taken on the 7th day following ET.

RESULTS: The average age of the majority of the participants was 30-39 years and had at least 4-5 years of subfertility. The unexplained subfertility was the prominent cause of ET failure in both groups. In most of the participants in both groups, ET was done using fresh embryo cycles with good to excellent embryo grades. After the ASP medium was manipulated in the OC in both groups, the positive implantation rate was not different in both groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The elimination of air bubbles in OC by using the ASP medium during ET did not confer an additional benefit nor exert a negative impact on implantation rate.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.