MyMedR

Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Power of 1 Malaysian Ringgit: A Low-Cost Prescription Cost-Sharing Model in Malaysia

Kwong KS, Choo YW, Cheah HM

Value Health Reg Issues, 2020 May;21:245-251.
PMID: 32353759 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.12.002

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the total revenue under a hypothetical 1 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) prescription cost sharing model in government healthcare facilities in Pahang, Malaysia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at outpatient pharmacy in all government healthcare facilities in Pahang from year 2013 to 2017. Each dispensed medication was calculated as 1 MYR and contributed to the total revenue.
RESULTS: A total of 11 hospitals and 81 health clinics were recruited into the study. A hospital could generate 0.311 million MYR per year, and a district health department could generate 0.623 million MYR per year, giving a total of 10.268 million MYR revenue every year in Pahang, Malaysia. Under the prescription medicines cost sharing scheme, it was shown that an average of 9.4% of the total pharmaceutical spending could be recovered. The recovery percentage was approximately fourfold higher in health clinics (16.5%-21.7%) when compared with that in hospitals (4.3%-5.2%).
CONCLUSION: An estimated 10 million MYR or 10% from the total Ministry of Health pharmaceutical spending could be collected under the proposed 1 MYR prescription cost sharing model.
Budget impact of increasing uptake of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Malaysia

Choo YW, Mohd Tahir NA, Mohamed Said MS, Makmor Bakry M, Li SC

Arch Osteoporos, 2023 Nov 30;18(1):145.
PMID: 38030861 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01358-z

This study evaluated the financial impact of increasing denosumab usage for managing postmenopausal osteoporosis over a 5-year period from the Malaysian healthcare provider's perspective. A gradual moderate increase in denosumab uptake would have a minimal budget impact, with potential savings in fracture treatment expenses. Optimizing denosumab usage could be a cost-effective and potentially affordable strategy to alleviate the economic burden of osteoporosis in Malaysia.
PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the budget impact of increasing the uptake of denosumab for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Malaysia.
METHODS: A Markov budget impact model was developed to estimate the financial impact of osteoporosis treatment. We modelled a scenario in which the uptake of denosumab would increase each year compared with a static scenario. A 5-year time horizon from the perspective of a Malaysian MOH healthcare provider was used. Model inputs were based on Malaysian sources where available. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the modelled results.
RESULTS: An increase in denosumab uptake of 8% per year over a 5-year time horizon would result in an additional budget impact, from MYR 0.26 million (USD 0.06 million) in the first year to MYR 3.25 million (USD 0.78 million) in the fifth year. When expressed as cost per-member-per-month (PMPM), these were less than MYR 0.01 across all five years of treatment. In sensitivity analyses, the acquisition cost of denosumab and medication persistence had the largest impact on the budget.
CONCLUSION: From the perspective of a Malaysian MOH healthcare provider, moderately increasing uptake of denosumab would have a minimal additional budget impact, partially offset by savings in fracture treatment costs. Increasing the use of denosumab appears affordable to reduce the economic burden of osteoporosis in Malaysia.
Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Malaysia

Choo YW, Mohd Tahir NA, Mohamed Said MS, Li SC, Makmor Bakry M

Osteoporos Int, 2022 Sep;33(9):1909-1923.
PMID: 35641572 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06444-5

From the perspective of Malaysian health care providers, denosumab was cost-effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, with an optimal outcome starting at age 60 years. Our results provide important insights into the value for money of anti-osteoporotic agents that can serve as a reference for other countries with comparable epidemiological data.
INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of denosumab with alendronate and no treatment in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis among the Malaysian population.
METHODS: A well-validated Markov model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab in a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal osteoporotic women between 50 and 80 years old who had no history of fractures. A 10-year time horizon from the perspective of Malaysian health care providers was used in this analysis. The model parameters, including transition probabilities and costs, were based on Malaysian sources. Treatment efficacy data were obtained from a network meta-analysis. The study outcomes were presented as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of the results. A cost-effectiveness threshold was set at MYR 21,438 (USD 5175) per QALY.
RESULTS: Denosumab was found to be a cost-effective option for postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 60 and older. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for denosumab versus alendronate ranged from MYR 16,955 (USD 4093) per QALY at age 60 to MYR 4380 (USD 1057) per QALY at age 80. The cost-effectiveness of denosumab improved monotonically with increasing age. Denosumab was 72.8-92.7% likely to be cost-effective at the cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were robust across all parameter variations, with the annual cost of denosumab being the most sensitive.
CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the Malaysian health care provider, denosumab appears to be a cost-effective treatment choice for postmenopausal osteoporotic women over 60 years of age.
Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: a systematic review of measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41

Choo YW, Mohd Tahir NA, Mohamed Said MS, Makmor Bakry M

Osteoporos Int, 2024 May;35(5):745-757.
PMID: 38194151 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-07005-0

The 41-item Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) is a widely used and freely available patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). However, data on its reliability, validity, and responsiveness remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Library from their inception up to December 2022 was performed. Data were extracted, and the methodological quality of each measurement property was evaluated according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The evidence of the measurement properties was rated against the updated criteria for good measurement properties, and the quality of evidence was graded using the modified GRADE approach. A total of 99 articles were identified, of which eight studies were included in the review. The QUALEFFO-41 is categorized as B as it demonstrated moderate quality evidence for sufficient content validity, moderate-to-high quality evidence for sufficient hypothesis testing for construct validity (except for the social function domain for convergent validity), and very low-quality evidence for sufficient responsiveness. For structural validity and internal consistency, only the domains of pain and general health perception were sufficient with low-quality evidence. For reliability, only the domain of physical function was sufficient with low-quality evidence. None of the studies reported measurement error, cross-cultural validity, and criterion validity. The QUALEFFO-41 may be a promising, valid, and reliable PROM to assess HRQoL in osteoporosis patients with vertebral fractures. However, future studies must focus on good methodological quality to strengthen the evidence of measurement properties, especially on structural validity, reliability, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity. The systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41 questionnaire for assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in osteoporosis patients. The review found moderate-to-high-quality evidence for construct validity but limited evidence for responsiveness and other properties. Future studies should focus on strengthening the evidence, particularly for structural validity, reliability, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity. The QUALEFFO-41 shows promise as a valid and reliable PROM for HRQoL assessment in osteoporosis patients.
Sunitinib DDI with paracetamol, diclofenac, mefenamic acid and ibuprofen shows sex-divergent effects on the tissue uptake and distribution pattern of sunitinib in mice

Tan SY, Wong MM, Tiew AL, Choo YW, Lim SH, Ooi IH, et al.

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2016 10;78(4):709-18.
PMID: 27495788 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-3120-9

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic interaction of sunitinib with diclofenac, paracetamol, mefenamic acid and ibuprofen was evaluated due to their P450 mediated metabolism and OATP1B1, OATP1B3, ABCB1, ABCG2 transporters overlapping features.
METHODS: Male and female mice were administered 6 sunitinib doses (60 mg/kg) PO every 12 h and 30 min before the last dose were administered vehicle (control groups), 250 mg/kg paracetamol, 30 mg/kg diclofenac, 50 mg/kg mefenamic acid or 30 mg/kg ibuprofen (study groups), euthanized 6 h post last administration and sunitinib plasma, liver, kidney, brain concentrations analyzed.
RESULTS: Ibuprofen halved sunitinib plasma concentration in female mice (p