AIM: Evaluate the differences in the degree of AEFI on each type of COVID-19 vaccine platform.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research used a quantitative analytical observational design with a cross sectional approach. Data collection from participants was carried out by filling out questionnaires. The collected data was tabulated and statistical analysis was carried out.
RESULTS: A total of 217 respondents who received three doses of vaccine participated in the study. Of the 651 vaccine doses studied, the results showed that there were significant differences in the degree of AEFI between the three types of vaccine platforms. The degree of AEFI was significantly different (p < 0.05) between each type of vaccine platform, with the degree of AEFI starting from the lowest, namely inactivated vaccine, then viral vector vaccine and the highest was nucleic acid vaccine.
CONCLUSION: The degree of AEFI differs significantly between each COVID-19 vaccine platform. The degree of AEFI, from the mildest to the most severe, was inactivated vaccine, viral vector vaccine and nucleic acid vaccine. No serious AEFI was reported.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study design was used. Patients were recruited through purposive sampling from pulmonology outpatient clinic and inpatient ward at Jemursari Islamic Hospital (RSI Jemursari), Surabaya from July 2023 to December 2023. All enrolled patients should have been previously tested positive or negative for pulmonary TB using AFB staining, Xpert MTB and chest x-ray. Blood samples of the patients were collected and processed using the IchromaTM IGRA-TB diagnostic kit. The results were then compared with gold standard methods for calculating the IGRA-TB diagnostic value.
RESULTS: A total of 56 adult patients were enrolled in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy rate of IGRA-TB using IchromaTM IGRA-TB diagnostic kit were 80.56%, 85%, 90.62%, 70.83% and 82.14%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: IchromaTM IGRA-TB showed reasonably high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, indicating that this method can be further utilised as a diagnostic and screening tool for pulmonary TB.