Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Yeo YH, Wong HKK, Vignarajah A, Vigneswaramoorthy N, Mehta NK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2026 Nov;69(8):2197-2203.
    PMID: 41575718 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-02235-0
    BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is associated with up to a 19-fold increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its impact on clinical outcomes in AF patients receiving rhythm control therapy remains unclear.

    METHODS: Using the TriNetX research network, we identified adult patients with AF who underwent rhythm control therapy, including antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, or catheter ablation. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of HH. Clinical outcomes, including ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause readmission, and heart failure (HF) exacerbation, were assessed at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up. Further subanalyses were performed to compare patients with HH who underwent surgical repair with those who did not, as well as patients with HH who underwent repair with those without HH. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied separately to each cohort to adjust for differences in age, sex, comorbidities, and medication use, ensuring balanced baseline characteristics.

    RESULTS: We identified 2,348,576 patients with AF who underwent rhythm control strategies. Among them, 246,010 (10.5%; mean age 74.2 ± 11.0 years; 51.2% female) had HH, while 2,102,566 (89.5%; mean age 70.8 ± 12.7 years; 40.0% female) did not. After PSM, 243,376 patients were included in each cohort. The presence of HH was associated with significantly higher odds of ischemic stroke (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.09-1.13 at 1 year; OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.13-1.16 at 5 years), major bleeding (OR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.86-1.93 at 1 year; OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.75-1.80 at 5 years), and all-cause readmission (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10-1.12 at 1 year; OR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.15-1.18 at 5 years) compared to patients without HH (all p 

  2. Mehta NK, Vaishnav A, Priyadarshini MB, Debbarma P, Hoque MS, Mondal P, et al.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2024 Sep;31(42):54381-54401.
    PMID: 39223414 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34792-8
    Seafood is abundant in high-quality protein, healthy fats (n-3 and n-6 PUFAs), minerals (calcium, magnesium, copper, selenium, and so on), and vitamin D. Functional compounds in seafood can protect against lifestyle-related diseases. Having had all the merits mentioned, it is also a highly putrefiable food item. To maintain quality and prolong seafood's shelf life, various chemicals have been added, including nitrite, sulfur dioxide, and formaldehyde. In this review, we summarize the uses, the incidence of added formalin contamination, and the approved limit for seafood products. Additionally, worldwide regulations or standards for the use of formalin in seafood products, as well as recent changes relevant to new methods, are highlighted. Although strict limits and regulations have been placed on the utilization of formaldehyde for seafood preservation, there are few incidences reported of formalin/formaldehyde detection in seafood products around Asian countries. In this context, various qualitative and quantitative detection methods for formaldehyde have been developed to ensure the presence of formaldehyde within acceptable limits. Besides this, different rules and regulations have been forced by each country to control formaldehyde incidence. Although it is not an issue of formaldehyde incidence in European countries, strict regulations are implemented and followed.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links