Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Rajagopal R, Cheah FC, Monagle P
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016 Feb;21(1):50-6.
    PMID: 26553525 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.10.005
    The incidence of preterm thromboembolism has been increasing due to advances in diagnostic imaging which allow better detection of thrombi in sick preterm infants. At the same time, improvement in neonatal intensive care unit supportive care has increased the number of surviving and living preterm infants with thromboembolic risk factors. Disruption in the fine balance of hemostasis with potential risk factors, specifically septicemia and indwelling catheters, increase the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Treatment strategies in preterm infants are challenging due to limited data.
  2. Rajagopal R, Thachil J, Monagle P
    Arch Dis Child, 2017 Feb;102(2):187-193.
    PMID: 27540263 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311053
    Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in paediatrics is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although there have been several recent advances in the pathophysiology of DIC, most of these studies were done in adults. Since the haemostatic system is very different in early life and changes dramatically with age, creating a variety of challenges for the clinician, delay in the diagnosis of DIC can happen until overt DIC is evident. In this review article, we report the aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tests and a management algorithm to guide paediatricians when treating patients with DIC.
  3. Solh Z, Rajagopal R, Thachil J, Chan AK, Monagle P
    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2023 Aug 01;45(6):e784-e788.
    PMID: 37494616 DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002703
    The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) provides objective disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) measurement through diagnostic criteria validated in adults. The applicability of these criteria in pediatric and neonatal DIC is controversial and unvalidated. Primary objective: to evaluate current practice in pediatric and neonatal DIC management among different specialties. Secondary objective: to understand the potential impact of developmental hemostasis on DIC laboratory evaluation. We performed a multicenter survey between January and September 2016. The questionnaire was distributed internationally through professional societies. In all, 211 responses were received, of which 160 were full responses and 51 were partial. Overall, 85% of respondents practiced in tertiary academic centers; 70% practiced in pediatric-only hospitals. The majority of respondents (42%) used their personal clinical experience in the management of DIC. Sixty percent of respondents treated DIC until the resolution of both clinical and laboratory parameters. Laboratory investigations were monitored in the majority of DIC cases without thrombosis or bleeding (80%); age-specific reference ranges for tests were lacking in 20% of pediatric-only hospitals and 35% of combined pediatric/adult hospitals. Adherence to standardized DIC guidelines was poor but varied by geographical location. This survey reveals variable practices among pediatricians in the management of DIC. Further studies are needed to validate the DIC diagnostic criteria in children.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links