Heparin-binding protein 17 (HBp17), first purified in 1991 from the conditioned medium of the human A431 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell line, was later renamed fibroblast growth factor-binding protein 1 (FGFBP-1). HBp17/FGFBP-1 is specifically expressed and secreted by epithelial cells, and it reversibly binds to fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-1 and FGF-2, as well as FGFs-7, -10, and -22, indicating a crucial involvement in the transportation and function of these FGFs. Our laboratory has investigated and reported several studies to elucidate the function of HBp17/FGFBP-1 in SCC cells and its potential as a molecular therapeutic target. HBp17/FGFBP-1 transgene exoression in A431-4 cells, a clonal subline of A431 that lacks tumorigenicity and does not express HBp17/FGFBP-1, demonstrated a significantly enhanced proliferation in vitro compared with A431-4 cells, and it acquired tumorigenicity in the subcutis of nude mice. Knockout (KO) of the HBp17/FGFBP-1 by genome editing significantly suppressed tumor growth, cell motility, and tumorigenicity compared with control cells. A comprehensive analysis of expressed molecules in both cell types revealed that molecules that promote epithelial cell differentiation were highly expressed in HBp17/FGFBP-1 KO cells. Additionally, we reported that 1α,25(OH)2D3 or eldecalcitol (ED-71), which is an analog of 1α,25(OH)2D3, suppresses HBp17/FGFBP-1 expression and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells signaling pathway. Here, we discuss the prospects of molecular targeted therapy targeting HBp17/FGFBP-1 with 1α,25(OH)2D3 or ED71 in SCC and oral SCC.
We have previously reported that 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibits NF-κB activity and thus inhibits growth of OSCC cells in serum-free culture and down-regulates HBp17/FGFBP-1 expression, which is important for cancer cell growth and angiogenesis. Here, we have investigated the effects of ED-71, an analog of vitamin D3 (VD) on OSCC cell lines in serum-free culture. It is known that ED-71 has a stronger inhibitory effect on bone resorption compared to VD and other VD analogs. To the best of our knowledge, there was no report examining the potential of ED-71 as an anti-cancer agent for OSCC. We found that ED-71 is able to inhibit the growth of cancer cell lines at a concentration of hundred times lower than calcitriol. As Cyp24A1 was reportedly induced in cancer cells, we measured the expression of CYP24A1 in OSCC cell lines (NA and UE), A431 epidermoid carcinoma and normal fibroblast cell (gfi) in serum-free culture. As a result, CYP24A1 mRNA and the protein expression in the OSCC cells treated with ED-71 increased in a dose-dependent manner. However, in vivo experiment, in which the A431 cells were implanted in mice, tumor formation was reduced by the ED-71 treatment with no significant difference between Cyp24A1 expression in the tumors of ED-71-treated and control group, as analyzed by western blotting and immunohistochemistry. These results suggest that ED-71 is a potential anti-cancer agent for OSCC.
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.