OBJECTIVES: To map self-management for pain in patients with cancer at all phases of the disease before examining the potential of pain self-care interventions for ill patients with cancer.
METHODS: A search was conducted on six electronic databases to locate studies published in English, from 2013 to 2023. We followed Arskey and O'Malley's Scoping Reviews guidelines.
RESULTS: This study thoroughly examined the provision of cancer pain self-management by healthcare professionals and identified four intervention types from 23 studies. Education emerged as the most prevalent form of self-management for cancer pain.
CONCLUSION: Guiding patients in managing their pain effectively, starting from their hospitalisation and extending to their discharge.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a quasiexperimental on 84 participants with DM, which was randomised into intervention (n=42) and control (n=42) groups. The intervention group was provided with health education through booklets and cell phone-based telenursing for four sessions and four sessions of follow-up, while the control group was given health education according to standards from the health centre (Puskesmas). All respondents had their FBG levels checked before, one month, and two months follow-up. The data were analysed using paired sample t-tests, independent samples t-test, and repeated ANOVA.
RESULTS: The mean FBG measurements in the intervention group prior to treatment were 210.88mg/dL, decreased to 173.21mg/dL in the first month, and 177.48mg/dL in the second month (follow-up), while the control group started at 206.36mg/dL, decreased to 182.55mg/dL in the first month, and 191.64mg/dL in the second month. The difference between the two groups was not significant in both the intervention and control groups, p=0.181.
CONCLUSION: Health education through mobile phone-based telenursing and standard health centres both affect FBG levels of people with DM.
METHODS: This descriptive quantitative study utilized a cross-sectional design, with 236 respondents recruited through consecutive sampling. Data were collected using the Stroke Recognition Questionnaire (SRQ) and analyzed through univariate statistical methods, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
RESULTS: Among the 236 respondents, 53.4% demonstrated a moderate level of knowledge, 31.4% had low knowledge, and the remaining respondents showed a high level of knowledge. The average knowledge score was 64.61 (SD = 13.57; range = 26-97). Participants aged 20-44 years had the highest proportion of high knowledge levels (11.4%), whereas older adults aged over 60 years were more commonly classified in the low-knowledge category (36.1%).
CONCLUSION: The greater proportion of low knowledge among older adults highlights a priority population for targeted education. Integrating structured stroke recognition education into routine hypertension care may strengthen preparedness for early symptom recognition and facilitate timely access to emergency stroke services.