METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted among 58 patients from Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah Alor Setar. Data were analysed with logistic regression analysis using SPSS. Factors studied included age during surgery, bile duct diameter at the porta hepatic, race of patient, preoperative total bilirubin level and cholangitis. These factors were analysed to determine its significance as a prognostic factor affecting the outcome of Kasai surgery.
RESULTS: Older age group above 56 days of life, bile duct diameter at porta hepatis measuring <50μm, pre-operative total bilirubin >10mg% and cholangitis were found to be poor prognostic factors from univariate regression analysis. Variables having p value<0.025 were analysed using the multivariable regression analysis. Only age of patient and diameter of bile duct at the porta hepatis were eligible for this analysis. The final analysis showed that age 57 days of life and above (adjusted odd's ratio (aOR) = 9.412, p value = 0.042, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.079 to 82.104) and bile duct diameter <50μm (aOR = 13.812, p value = 0.016, 95%CI = 1.616 to 118.042) were significant factors affecting the outcome.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, age of patient 56 days of life and younger and diameter of bile duct at porta hepatis ≥50μm gave a significantly better outcome after Kasai surgery.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of BA patients who underwent Kasai procedure at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia from August 2012 to December 2018. The cut-off values of TB7/TB0, GGT7/GGT0, and ALT7/ALT0 for prediction of patients' survival were determined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Log-rank tests were utilised to test the association between cut-off values and overall survival.
RESULTS: In all 46 BA patients (23 males and 23 females) after Kasai procedure were included, consisting of one type 1, 17 type 2A, seven type 2B, and 21 type 3. The cut-off values of TB7/TB0, ALT7/ALT0 and GGT7/GGT0 for overall survival was 0.455 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 22.7%, area under curve (AUC) 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 0.42, 0.75), 0.481 (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 18.2%, AUC 0.49; 95%CI: 0.31, 0.65), and and 0.31 (sensitivity 79.2%, specificity 9.1%, AUC 0.34; 95%CI: 0.18, 0.50), respectively. However, these cut-off values were not significantly associated with overall survival, with p-values of 0.18, 0.49, and 0.56, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The TB7/TB0, ALT7/ALT0, and GGT7/GGT0 might not predict the overall survival of BA patients after Kasai procedure. Further multicentre studies with a larger sample size is needed to clarify our findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study on the HRQoL using the PedsQL4.0 generic core scales in children with BA aged between 2 to 18 years followed up at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) in Malaysia was conducted. Two groups, consisting of healthy children and children with chronic liver disease (CLD) caused by other aetiologies, were recruited as controls.
RESULTS: Children with BA living with their native livers (n = 36; median (range) age: 7.4 (2 to 18) years; overall HRQoL score: 85.6) have a comparable HRQoL score with healthy children (n = 81; median age: 7.0 years; overall HQRoL score: 87.4; P = 0.504) as well as children with CLD (n = 44; median age: 4.3 years; overall score: 87.1; P = 0.563). The HRQoL of children with BA was not adversely affected by having 1 or more hospitalisations in the preceding 12 months, the presence of portal hypertension, older age at corrective surgery (>60 days), a lower level of serum albumin (≤34 g/L) or a higher blood international normalised ratio (INR) (≥1.2). Children who had liver transplantation for BA did not have a significantly better HRQoL as compared to those who had survived with their native livers (85.4 vs 85.7, P = 0.960).
CONCLUSION: HRQoL in children with BA living with their native livers is comparable to healthy children.