Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Lo TS, Jaili S, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Karim NB, Ibrahim R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2017 Mar;43(3):543-550.
    PMID: 28160508 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13234
    AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the management outcomes of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in nulliparous women.

    METHODS: Eight nulliparous women diagnosed with POP ≥ stage 3 between January 2005 and August 2013, according to the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POPQ), were reviewed. Seven were managed surgically and one was managed with pessary. Primary outcome was surgical objective cure (POP-Q ≤ 1) and subjective cure, defined as negative response to questions 2 and 3 on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6. Secondary outcomes were complications, symptoms' severity and quality of life according to validated questionnaires.

    RESULTS: A total of 1275 prolapse patients with POP-Q ≥ stage 3 were managed surgically, among whom seven (0.55%) were nulliparous. Each woman had at least one risk factor associated with POP. Risk factors identified were history of pelvic trauma, obesity, menopause, chronic cough, hard physical labor and constipation. Five patients underwent surgical correction (vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous fixation) with mesh (Perigee, n = 3; Avaulta, n = 2). Two patients had uterine preservation without mesh (hysteropexy with sacrospinous ligament fixation). One patient preferred treatment with pessary. The total cure rate (objective and subjective cure rates) was 86% after surgical reconstructive surgery.

    CONCLUSION: Management of nulliparous advanced POP poses significant challenges with regard to uterine preservation, future pregnancy and childbirth. Conservative management with pessary insertion should be offered followed by surgical correction. Reconstructive surgery with mesh may improve prolapse symptoms objectively and subjectively.

    Matched MeSH terms: Hysterectomy, Vaginal/methods
  2. Lo TS, Pue LB, Tan YL, Hsieh WC, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC
    Int Urogynecol J, 2019 07;30(7):1163-1172.
    PMID: 30008078 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6
    INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6-12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP.

    METHODS: A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP, ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate, negative feedback to POPDI-6.

    RESULTS: Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points except for Gh and Pb. There was a significant difference in the distance between the bladder neck to the distal end of the mesh during straining both at both the postoperative 3rd month and 1 year.

    CONCLUSIONS: Uphold™ mesh has a 20% incidence of de novo USI with acceptable objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively. The de novo USI rate was high but not bothersome enough to require surgery.

    Matched MeSH terms: Hysterectomy, Vaginal/methods*
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links