OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide insights into global perceptions on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy across diverse populations and regions.
METHODS: We conducted a literature search across major databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analysis that reported COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. The AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of included systematic reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with a random effect model. The data synthesis is presented in a table format and via a narrative.
RESULTS: Our inclusion criteria were met by 78 meta-analyses published between 2021 and 2023. Our analysis revealed a moderate vaccine acceptance rate of 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) in the general population, with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97.59%). Higher acceptance rates were observed among health care workers and individuals with chronic diseases, at 64% (95% CI 0.57%-0.71%) and 69% (95% CI 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower acceptance was noted among pregnant women, at 48% (95% CI 0.42%-0.53%), and parents consenting for their children, at 61.29% (95% CI 0.56%-0.67%). The pooled vaccine hesitancy rate was 32% (95% CI 0.25%-0.39%) in the general population. The quality assessment revealed 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, and 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This review revealed the presence of vaccine hesitancy globally, emphasizing the necessity for population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions and clear, credible information dissemination to foster vaccine acceptance. The observed disparities accentuate the need for continuous research to understand evolving vaccine perceptions and to address the unique concerns and needs of diverse populations, thereby aiding in the formulation of effective and inclusive vaccination strategies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr.
OBJECTIVES: Our review aims to elucidate potential mechanisms by which serotonergic psychedelics may alleviate the symptoms of PCS.
RESULTS: Potential mechanisms through which serotonergic psychedelics may alleviate PCS symptoms are discussed, with emphasis on their effects on inflammation, neuroplasticity, and gastrointestinal function. Additionally, this review explores the potential of serotonergic psychedelics in mitigating endothelial dysfunction, a pivotal aspect of PCS pathophysiology implicated in organ dysfunction. This review also examines the potential role of serotonergic psychedelics in alleviating specific PCS symptoms, which include olfactory dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, and mental health challenges.
CONCLUSIONS: Emerging evidence suggests that serotonergic psychedelics may alleviate PCS symptoms. However, further high-quality research is needed to thoroughly assess their safety and efficacy in treating patients with PCS.